My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 55C
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
08/05/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 55C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2018 1:01:18 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 9:53:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
55C
Date
8/5/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
infrastructure in this transportation project will limit, not catalyze or enhance, economic <br />development capacity. How many people do we have riding bikes now and the demand for bike <br />huts. <br />3. public safety will be undermined if we move forward with the street car and no bike <br />infrastructure :bicyclists and motorists will be competing for the same roadway space which <br />can be dangerous for bicyclist because of the street car tracks. This will also cause right -of -way <br />conflicts which will discourage people from using non - motorized transportation. I am sure this is <br />not our intent for the Downtown? Finally, if we move forward without any bike infrastructure, It <br />will cause the city increased litigation costs as bicyclists will get injured. <br />Fed Hwy Administration safety <br />site:http: / /www.fhwa.dot.gov /livability /fact sheets /transandsafety.cfrn <br />To conclude on a good note, I am supportive of on street - parking if we use reverse- angle- head - <br />out parking and add bike lanes. Please note, several cities across the country have been using <br />reverse -angle- head -out parking for decades. Tuscon did this in/around the Univ. of AZ and <br />dropped car/bike collisions by 80 or so percent. <br />Michele Martinez <br />714 - 887 -9845 <br />*please excuse any misspellings. I composed this email via my iPhone* <br />On Aug 5, 2014, at 11:41 AM, "Cavazos, David" <DCavazos@santa- ana.org> wrote: <br />Fyi. david <br />From: Cathy Higley [mailto chialeyCa�cordobacorp com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:21 AM <br />To: Cavazos, David; Galvez, William E.; City Council <br />Cc: George Pla; Gabriel, Jason <br />Subject: RE: Bike Lanes on 4th Street <br />I think we need to clarify that bicycle facilities are not an element of the streetcar <br />project; FTA and OCTA would agree and would not willing fund bicycle lanes as part of <br />the project. However, implementing streetcar on 4 "' Street opens up the opportunity to <br />incorporate bicycles on 4`" Street that would not be possible without streetcar — <br />bicycles and diagonal parking are not compatible. The elimination of diagonal parking <br />along the south side, provides a safer environment and the space to accommodate a <br />bicycle facility. A vote in support of streetcar, with or without bike lanes included, <br />furthers the cause of bicycles on 4 `" Street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.