Laserfiche WebLink
Final El No. 2011 -01, VA No. 2012 -04 & VTTM No. 2012 -02 <br />February 10, 2014 <br />Page 8 <br />• That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding property. <br />That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability to <br />make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the following <br />analysis, which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />Variance for the Sexlinger Farmhouse <br />The applicant is requesting a variance that will allow the Sexlinger Farmhouse to remain at its <br />current location. Specifically, a variance from Section 41 -234 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code <br />(SAMC), which requires a front yard setback of 20 feet, from Section 41- 239(g), which requires the <br />garage to be a minimum of five feet from the residence, and from Section 41- 41- 1320(b), which <br />requires the residence to provide a two -car garage, are needed. Staff is supportive of the request <br />as the variances will allow the historically designated Sexlinger Farmhouse to remain in its historic <br />setting and context, which are critical components of historic preservation. The property will be <br />allowed to be used as it was historically, with the historic character of the property retained and <br />preserved. Further, by leaving the residence and garage in place, the removal of distinctive <br />materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize the property <br />will be avoided. <br />In analyzing the variance request, staff must be able to show that findings can be made that <br />support the criteria listed above. <br />• The project site has a special circumstance related to its size, shape and location. The <br />approval of the variance for the Sexlinger Farmhouse will result in the residence and garage <br />retaining and preserving the historic character of the property. Further, the approval of the <br />variance will avoid the removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and <br />spatial relationships that characterize the property. Therefore, applying the strict letter of the <br />Code would, in this particular case, deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at <br />variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. <br />• The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights. Compliance with the setback, separation and parking standards would result in <br />the loss of a resource that is listed on the City's Register of Historical Properties as the <br />structure would have to be relocated. The granting of the variance will preserve the property <br />owners right to develop the property with a use that is allowed by right in the R -1 zoning district <br />and is consistent with the general plan. The new use will allow the development of a vacant <br />property which will preserve the property owner's right to develop their property. <br />75B -10 <br />