Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />AUGUST 5, 2014 <br />TITLE: <br />RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A WAIVER OF THE <br />NEW APPLICATION FEE FOR THE PRIVATE <br />PARTY NOMINATIONS OF PROPERTIES TO THE <br />SANTA ANA REGISTER HISTORICAL <br />PROPERTIES AND MODIFICATION OF MILLS <br />ACT AGREEMENT FEES <br />CITY MANA _ R <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />0:• tt <br />❑ As Recommended <br />❑ As Amended <br />❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading <br />❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading <br />❑ Implementing Resolution <br />❑ Set Public Hearing For <br />CONTINUED TO 9- 0?'Ixl <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Adopt a resolution authorizing a one -year program to encourage historic preservation by <br />temporarily waiving private party nominations of properties to the Santa Ana register of historical <br />properties fees and reducing Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act) fees. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Background on Historic Preservation Fees <br />In March 2009, the City Council adopted a resolution that provided for a comprehensive update <br />of the City's development processing fees. The new fee structure was the result of an extensive <br />study by both City staff and the consulting firm of MGT of America, Inc. The resulting fees were <br />based on 100% cost recovery of the actual cost in time and materials to provide a given service. <br />While the fee for Historic Property Preservation Agreements (Mills Act) was included in this study, <br />a fee for private party nomination of properties to the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties <br />was not included and continued to be offered for free. <br />When the Historic Preservation program was created in 2001, the decision to not charge a fee for <br />private party properties was made based on the concern that a fee would discourage property <br />owners from listing their properties. Given that the listing process was new and many historically - <br />significant properties were at risk of being lost if altered, the incentive provided by the free <br />application was deemed appropriate. <br />In 2010, the City Council adopted an ordinance amendment establishing a fee for self - <br />nominations. The decision to establish a fee for private party nominations was based on a <br />number of factors but primary amongst these was the determination that the most significant <br />properties had received historic status and further listings of nominated properties are primarily <br />for the purpose of receiving the Mills Act tax reduction. The fee was developed utilizing the same <br />methodology used to update the other development processing fees and was based on full cost <br />recovery. <br />55A -1 <br />