Laserfiche WebLink
Amendment Application No, 2014 -03 <br />Variance No. 2014 -03 <br />July 28, 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />Industrial (M1) zoning district. Subsequently, since the site has been vacant for over one year, any <br />proposed development on these properties for industrial uses would require multiple variances from <br />the M1 development standards. Additionally, the General Plan Land Use designation for the subject <br />properties is Low - Density Residential (LR -7) which is inconsistent with the current Light Industrial <br />zoning designation and would also have to be amended prior to developing the property for any <br />industrial uses. The zone change for the project is being recommended for approval due to two <br />reasons. First, the master plan for development in the City, the General Plan, has designated this <br />site as residential due to the development pattern in the area and the effects industrial uses have on <br />the health, safety and welfare on residential properties. Second, the properties size and overall lack <br />of compliance with the industrial development standards support the zone change request to Two- <br />Family Residential (R2) (Exhibit 10). <br />Setback Variance <br />The applicant is requesting a variance from the development standards established in the SAMC. <br />Specifically, relief is requested from Sections 41 -249 and 41 -250, which establish the minimum front <br />and side yard setbacks for single - family residences. Variance requests are governed by Section 41- <br />638 of the SAMC. Variance requests may be granted when it can be shown that the following can be <br />established: <br />• That there exists a special circumstance related to the property, such as size, shape, topography, <br />location or surroundings. <br />That the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights. <br />• That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding property <br />• That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability to <br />make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the following <br />analysis, which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />The Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance to allow a reduction in required <br />building setbacks at 1732 West Second Street due to the special circumstances related to the <br />property's reduced overall size and street frontage, To minimize impacts to the neighborhood, and at <br />the direction of the Planning Commission, the project has been redesigned to remove the proposed <br />second dwelling unit and maximize the rear yard open space. <br />75A -6 <br />