My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10A - MINUTES - 08-05-14
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/02/2014
>
10A - MINUTES - 08-05-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2014 4:54:59 PM
Creation date
8/28/2014 4:54:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
10A
Date
9/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Information was provided to the Santa Ana Unified School District <br />Public Information Office and various staff <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />• Received comments from: <br />• Public Meeting #1: Verbal comments from 6 individuals <br />• Public Meeting #2: Verbal comments from 4 individuals <br />• Public Meeting #3: Verbal comments from 24 individuals <br />• 4 postcards from residents <br />• Received emails /letters from 4 organizations and five community <br />groups <br />STAFF & CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION CRITERIA <br />• Community Input <br />• Environmental Review Results <br />• Technical Criteria: <br />• Transit - dependent households served <br />• Transit - supportiveness of land uses served <br />• Economic development potential along route <br />• Additional right -of -way required <br />• Travel times to key destinations <br />• Number of riders <br />• Ease of construction <br />• Cost (Capital and Operating) <br />RECOMMENDED ROUTE <br />• Staff & Consultant, Cordoba Corporation, recommend Streetcar <br />Alternative 1 <br />RECOMMENDED ROUTE (STREETCAR ALTERNATIVE 1) <br />• Strong community support for a streetcar system as opposed to a bus <br />option <br />• Highest daily ridership <br />• Alternative 1 - 6,100 <br />• Alternative 2 - 4,700 <br />• Serves greatest number of transit dependent households <br />• Most transit supportive land uses <br />• Compared to Alternative 2: <br />• Least right of way acquisition <br />• Lower cost <br />• Ease of Constructability <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10 AUGUST 5, 2014 <br />1 0A -10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.