Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />To: <br />From: <br />Subject: <br />David Cavazos <br />City Manager <br />Fred Mousavipour, Executive Director <br />Public Works Aaencv <br />Date: March 4, 2015 <br />Project 14-6809; Arterial Slurry Seal 2013-2014 <br />Chance Order No. 1 <br />ACCOUNTING UNIT -ACCOUNT -ACTIVITY NUMBER: 03217662-66220-14680901028 <br />JUSTIFICATION <br />EXTRA WORK AT AGREED UNIT PRICES <br />1. The contract documents require the contractor to reconstruct areas of deteriorated <br />pavement sections of street by removing and replacing street section to a depth of 12 - <br />inches before applying slurry seal. However, after field investigation of the project <br />locations, the existing conditions revealed that large partially damaged areas of <br />asphalt pavement do not necessitate this reconstruction method. Therefore, staff <br />directed the contractor to apply a thin lift overlay over these areas. This overlay <br />method cost was significantly lower than the full reconstruction method which allows <br />staff to repair a larger number of partially deteriorated areas by reducing the cost to <br />rehabilitate the pavement. Thus, staff was able to offset the original cost by adding <br />additional line items to grind and overlay the asphalt street at agreed unit cost as <br />shown below. The following contract items were added to compensate the contractor <br />for the decrease in quantity as a result of site conditions. (PCO #1) <br />CONTRACTOR : All American Asphalt <br />P.O. Box 2229 <br />' r <br />Corona, CA 92898 <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Arterial Slurry Seal 2013-2014; <br />CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT: <br />$ 289,272 <br />ACCOUNTING UNIT -ACCOUNT -ACTIVITY NUMBER: 03217662-66220-14680901028 <br />JUSTIFICATION <br />EXTRA WORK AT AGREED UNIT PRICES <br />1. The contract documents require the contractor to reconstruct areas of deteriorated <br />pavement sections of street by removing and replacing street section to a depth of 12 - <br />inches before applying slurry seal. However, after field investigation of the project <br />locations, the existing conditions revealed that large partially damaged areas of <br />asphalt pavement do not necessitate this reconstruction method. Therefore, staff <br />directed the contractor to apply a thin lift overlay over these areas. This overlay <br />method cost was significantly lower than the full reconstruction method which allows <br />staff to repair a larger number of partially deteriorated areas by reducing the cost to <br />rehabilitate the pavement. Thus, staff was able to offset the original cost by adding <br />additional line items to grind and overlay the asphalt street at agreed unit cost as <br />shown below. The following contract items were added to compensate the contractor <br />for the decrease in quantity as a result of site conditions. (PCO #1) <br />