Laserfiche WebLink
• Information was provided to the Santa Ana Unified School District <br />Public Information Office and various staff <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />• Received comments from: <br />• Public Meeting #1: Verbal comments from 6 individuals <br />• Public Meeting #2: Verbal comments from 4 individuals <br />• Public Meeting #3: Verbal comments from 24 individuals <br />• 4 postcards from residents <br />• Received emails/letters from 4 organizations and five community <br />groups <br />STAFF & CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION CRITERIA <br />• Community Input <br />• Environmental Review Results <br />• Technical Criteria: <br />• Transit -dependent households served <br />• Transit-supportiveness of land uses served <br />• Economic development potential along route <br />• Additional right-of-way required <br />• Travel times to key destinations <br />• Number of riders <br />• Ease of construction <br />• Cost (Capital and Operating) <br />RECOMMENDED ROUTE <br />• Staff & Consultant, Cordoba Corporation, recommend Streetcar <br />Alternative 1 <br />otj MeuWInW <br />A ... k ro <br />•es�•slm An9Nes <br />0,0 <br />�i 5 PTC <br />[jg M i <br />C wa 39 YY <br />RECOMMENDED ROUTE (STREETCAR ALTERNATIVE 1) <br />• Strong community support for a streetcar system as opposed to a bus <br />option <br />• Highest daily ridership <br />• Alternative 1 - 6,100 <br />• Alternative 2 - 4,700 <br />• Serves greatest number of transit dependent households <br />• Most transit supportive land uses <br />• Compared to Alternative 2: <br />• Least right of way acquisition <br />• Lower cost <br />• Ease of Constructability <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10 AUGUST 5, 2014 <br />