My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/16/2014
>
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2014 3:43:48 PM
Creation date
9/11/2014 2:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
9/16/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
604
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`Z <br />RUTAN <br />RUTAN 6 TUCKER, LLP <br />March 3, 2014 <br />VIA E -MAIL AND <br />HAND DELIVERY <br />Mayor Miguel Pulido <br />Members of the Santa Ana City Council <br />City of Santa Ana <br />PO Box 1988 M31 <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Jeffrey T. Melebing <br />Dii eel Dial: (7 14) 641 -3422 <br />E-mail: jmelclun0rutaacom <br />Re: Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard Residential Development Project Proposed At <br />1584 East Santa Clara Avenue <br />Dear Mayor Pulido and Members of the Santa Ana City Council: <br />This office has been engaged to assist Lutheran High School of Orange County and <br />Concordia University (collectively, the "Schools "), in connection with their applications for <br />residential development of the property located at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue ( "Project "). <br />On February 27, 2014, the City received letters from The Old Orchard Conservancy <br />( "TOOC "), and from its counsel, in opposition to the City's approval of the Project and its <br />associated Final Environmental Impact Report. Those letters primarily reiterate TOOC's <br />disagreement with the conclusions of the City's Planning Commission, staff, and expert <br />consultants with regard to the Historic Preservation Alternative. The City's staff and <br />independent expert consultants have done a thorough job in responding to those arguments — <br />most recently in the staff report prepared for the March 4, 2014 City Council meeting. <br />In addition to those matters, however, TOOC and its counsel mention two additional <br />arguments: (1) that the project will impact important agricultural lands, and (2) that the criteria <br />for granting a variance for "Lot 12" are not satisfied here. Neither argument has merit, but in the <br />abundance of caution the Schools respectfully submit the following discussion and materials <br />relating to those two issues. <br />With regard to agricultural lands, TOOC's counsel claims that "the loss of prime <br />agricultural soil is a significant impact" because the land has "a Storie Rating of 90 and Class I <br />capability." The City reviewed potential impacts on agricultural lands in the Initial Study for the <br />Project, and found that under both the Santa Ana General Plan and the State's Farmland <br />Mapping and Monitoring Project ( "FMMP "), the City does not contain any Prime Farmland, <br />Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. (Initial Study, Final FIR Appx. A, p. <br />25, 9[ A; see also Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq., Appx. G, § II(a).) A review of the Statewide <br />Rutan & Tucker, LLP � 611 Anton Blvd, Suite 1400, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 <br />PO Box 1950, Costa Mesa, CA 92628 -1950 7t4(i41 =511 E x 714 -546 -9035 680/030670 0001 <br />Orange County I Palo Alto I www.rutan.com 75A 3 5 6747449.1 a03/03/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.