My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/16/2014
>
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2014 3:43:48 PM
Creation date
9/11/2014 2:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
9/16/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
604
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The reduced street frontage for Lot 12 is a product of requests made by community <br />members, and endorsed by City staff, to create a curve to discourage cat - through traffic in the <br />proposed extension of Lyon Street through the project site. After the applicant agreed to this <br />modification, City staff further determined that a "knuckle" needed to be included in the newly - <br />created curve in Lyon Street in order to accommodate the turning movement for trash trucks and <br />similarly sized vehicles. The applicant agreed to that modification as well. <br />As a result of these two modifications, Lot 12 will have an irregular shape. It will be <br />particularly narrow in the front, and substantially wider toward the rear of the lot. <br />Under SAMC section 41 -638, variance requests may be granted when (1) there are <br />special circumstances related to the property, such as size, shape, topography, location or <br />surroundings, (2) the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of <br />substantial property rights, (3) the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public <br />or surrounding property, and (4) the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan. In this case, all four of the required criteria are satisfied. <br />First, the modifications to Lyon Street caused an irregular shape and configuration to Lot <br />No. 12. While 50 feet of street frontage is a standard that makes sense in the context of typical <br />rectangular lots, the insertion of roadway curves tends to encourage generally "pie shaped" <br />parcels, i.e., parcels that are narrow in the front and wider in the back. This is a special <br />circumstance relating to the size, shape, location, and surroundings of the two parcels. <br />Second, granting the variance will allow for the development of Lot 12, whereas denying <br />the variance would deny that lot from being developed to its planned, and highest and best, use. <br />hr this regard, the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the <br />property owners' substantial property rights. <br />Third, the variance will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. Lot 12 is part of <br />an overall planned development, and will be compliant with all other applicable development <br />standards. <br />Fourth, the project will not adversely affect the General Plan. The proposed project is <br />consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations for the property, will support move -up <br />housing, and will advance each of the following General Plan policies: Policy 1.4 — support <br />development of single - family residential lots; Policy 1.9 — result in a coordinated street and <br />parkway design that is attractive, functional and compatible with adjacent on -site development; <br />Policy 3.5 — encourage new development that is compatible in scale and consistent with the <br />architectural style of the neighborhood; and Policy 5.10 — support a circulation system that is <br />responsive to the needs of pedestrians and vehicular travel. <br />Comments the City received on February 11, 2013 assert that there are no circumstances <br />justifying the grant of a variance here because the overall Sexlinger property is a 5 acre <br />rectangular parcel, and because there is nothing unique about its size, shape, topography, <br />location, or surroundings. The focus on the overall five acre property is misplaced. The <br />variance is sought for the irregular shaped Lot 12 that will result from a subdivision of the <br />property in the manner necessary to accommodate staff and community concerns. In addition, <br />-13- <br />75A-99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.