Laserfiche WebLink
II. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES AND DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS <br />HUD requires that the City identify the federal funds that were available during the report period <br />that were used to further the objectives and goals of the City's Consolidated Plan. The City must <br />also outline how these funds were committed and expended. Table 3 provides this information. <br />TABLE 3— USE OF HUD FUNDS <br />1 1 a <br />Entitlement Grant <br />U <br />$5,682,348 <br />• <br />$1,131,852 <br />$1,471,369 <br />$414,408 <br />Program Income <br />$197,5271 <br />$355,2841 <br />$0 <br />$0 <br />Funds Committed <br />$2,110,639 2 <br />$720,2443 <br />$1,471,369:° <br />$414,408 5 <br />Funds Expended* <br />$5,170,766' <br />$506,879' <br />$777,521.337 <br />$277,8145 <br />+ Figures as of 08/09/2014 and are subject to change. <br />i. Based on PRC1 dated 08/05/2014 <br />2. Based on IDIS PR01 report dated 08/05/2014 <br />a. Based on IDIS PR27 report dated 08/05/2014. <br />4. Based on IDIS PR data as of 08/09/2014. <br />5. Based on IDS PR91 report dated 08/09/2014. <br />6. Based on IDIS PR26 report dated 08/09/2014; may include program income. <br />i. Based on IDIS PR07 report as of 08/09/2014 may include program income. <br />Additionally, the City is required to identify the geographic distribution of federal funds utilized <br />during the report period. <br />• CDBG program funds were expended based on program criteria. For example, public services <br />were available on a citywide basis for qualified beneficiaries; fair housing and program <br />administration activities were also carried out on a citywide basis. Housing code enforcement <br />and community development projects (e.g., street and park improvement projects) were <br />carried out in the City's Low- and Moderate - Income Area; i.e., areas of the City where the <br />majority of residents meet HUD's Low- and Moderate - Income definition - see EXHIBIT 1 - MAP <br />Low/MOD AREA & AREA OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION MAPS. <br />• HOME funds were utilized to support housing acquisition and rehabilitation activities for Very <br />Low- Income homeowners and tenants. To qualify for these funds an evaluation of household <br />income was undertaken. <br />• ESG funding was used to support programs that helped prevent homelessness or that assisted <br />those already homeless with emergency /transitional housing and related support services. To <br />ensure only eligible households were assisted, each program participant was required to <br />document their risk of homelessness or reason for homelessness. <br />• HOPWA funding was limited to activities that assisted persons living with HIV /AIDS and <br />immediate family (as applicable). <br />HUD also requires the City to indicate if resources were utilized to benefit areas with racial /ethnic <br />minority concentrations. Based on Census Bureau ethnicity /race estimates, Santa Ana is <br />5 DRAFT 2013- 2014 CAPER <br />Exhibit 2 <br />19F -14 <br />