Laserfiche WebLink
H. SELF-EVALUATION <br />HUD requires that the City evaluate its annual accomplishments by comparing planned activities <br />versus actual outcomes, and evaluate if progress was made toward meeting Consolidated Plan <br />goals. To assist with this evaluation, HUD has suggested the City should consider the following <br />questions: <br />1. Are activities and strategies making an impact on identified needs? <br />Most activities funded with HUD and other public resources have made an impact during the report <br />period. The following are examples: <br />• The use of public funds helped to expand and preserve the City's affordable housing stock by <br />assisting 204 housing units during 2013 -2014 7 The City's housing stock was also preserved via <br />the inspection of 4,736 housing units for code violations. <br />• The City's CoC system continued to address the housing and service needs of the City's and the <br />region's homeless families and individuals. Components of the City's system of care carried out <br />during the report period included outreach, supportive services, homelessness prevention, <br />emergency shelter, transitional housing, and access to permanent housing. The needs of the <br />homeless with special needs (e.g., victims of domestic violence, persons living with HIV /AIDS, <br />and the chronic homeless) were also addressed by Santa Ana's CoC system. These program <br />efforts helped address priority needs identified in the City's Consolidated Plan. <br />• Various programs, including the Work Force Investment Act resources, addressed employment <br />training and job placement needs. The State designated Enterprise Zone and the City's business <br />attraction and retention programs also provided economic opportunities to residents. <br />• In order to meet the changing needs of the community, the City supported public services and <br />public facility improvement projects. Public services for lower income youth and seniors help <br />stabilize households by providing services such as recreation and nutrition programs. <br />2. What indicators would best describe the results? <br />Comparing actual versus planned accomplishments is one of the best means available to measure <br />results of program efforts. <br />• During the 2013 -2014 report period two major housing projects were completed that resulted <br />in the creation of 90 rental units. The projects included the Vista Del Rio project, dedicated to <br />developmentally disabled adults, resulted in the construction of 40 units; and WBBB Project <br />that resulted in the construction of 50 units (20 HOME units) of affordable rental housing for <br />lower income households. <br />Several reasons exist that account for the City falling short of its 2013 -2014 housing program goals. <br />These reasons include the following: <br />7 200 multi- family housing units were assisted during the report period. Total does not include one unit assisted <br />with NSP funds during 2013 -2014. <br />30 DRAFT 2013 -2014 CAPER <br />f4pt59 <br />