My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/02/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2014 5:02:03 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 1:28:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
9/2/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SheppardMullin <br />September 2, 2014 <br />VIA FACSIMILE AND E -MAIL <br />City Council <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Fax: (714) 647 -6956 <br />Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP <br />650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor <br />Costa Mesa, CA 92626 -1993 <br />714.513.5100 main <br />714.513.5130 main fax <br />www.sheppardnnul;in.com <br />714.424.2821 direct <br />drosenthal@sheppardmullin.com <br />File Number: 0010. 174415 <br />Re: 9/212014 Agenda Item 75B — Sexlinoer Farmhouse and Orchard <br />Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: <br />The City Council made numerous serious factual and legal errors when it approved replacement <br />of the historic Sexlinger Orchard with a run -of- the -mill tract map on March 4, 2014. Adopting <br />new findings for a bad decision, as proposed by Staff, does not resolve the problems with the <br />City's original findings. The new findings are a blatant attempt to pad the administrative record <br />with after - the -fact justifications in The Old Orchard Conservancy's pending lawsuit against the <br />poorly- conceived Sexlinger development project. In fact, the proposed action shows a <br />fundamental disrespect for both the Court and the Planning and Zoning Laws, <br />The Old Orchard Conservancy continues to object to approval of Vesting Tract Map No. 2013- <br />02 (tract map) and Variance No. 2012 -04(b) (variance) for all of the reasons set forth in its prior <br />submittals to the City and the petition in TOOC v. COSA, Orange County Case No. 30-2014 - <br />00714225-CU-WM-CXC. All of these written and verbal submittals, including the petition, are <br />incorporated by reference in this letter of objection. They are contained in the administrative <br />record for TOOC v. COSA, which has been submitted to the City Clerk. In addition, the <br />Conservancy objects to "consideration" of the project after the approvals are final for the <br />purpose of adding findings to the record. <br />The Sexlinoer Development Project Is Flawed And Destructive To The Community <br />As described in the Conservancy's prior submittals, as well as the City's documentation, the <br />Sexlinger Orchard and Farmhouse is a unique resource in the City of Santa Ana. The Council <br />recognized the historic importance of the 5 -acre Farmhouse and Orchard by designating it as a <br />KEY historic resource under the City's Municipal Code. The tract map and variance allow <br />demolition of 95% of the historic Orchard, leaving the Farmhouse to be sold without its setting <br />and unprotected by any permanent mitigation measures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.