My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-060 - Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2014
>
2014-060 - Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2014 2:21:56 PM
Creation date
10/3/2014 1:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2014-060
Date
9/16/2014
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard <br />Residential Development Project CEQA Findings <br />E. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS <br />1. Impact: Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or <br />indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -48, 5 -49; January 2014 EIR Attachment, pp. <br />6 -7.) <br />Analysis: The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) recommends a <br />screening level threshold of 3,000 metric tons of GHG emissions per year for residential <br />and commercial developments. The proposed project's maximum annual emissions are <br />507 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents from project operations. This accounts for <br />0,0001 percent of California's GHG emissions. GHG emissions from construction of the <br />project would peak at approximately 2,371 pounds per day, with emissions for the whole <br />construction period totaling 247.4 metric tons. An analysis of impacts to existing carbon <br />sequestration resulting from the removal of the majority of the site's orange tree orchard <br />was completed. This analysis determined that up to 1,300 metric tons of GHGs could be <br />sequestered by the existing orchard. When the project's estimated GHG emissions are <br />combined with the loss of sequestration, the overall project impact increases to 1,807 <br />metric tons of GHG emissions per year. This amount is well below the significance <br />threshold established by SCAQMD and therefore impacts are considered less than <br />significant. (January 2014 EIR Attachment, pp. 9 -10, Table 1.) <br />Impact: Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted <br />for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -48, 5 -49; January 2014 EIR Attachment, pp. <br />6 -7.) <br />Analysis: California Assembly Bill 32 and Senate Bill 375 are polices adopted for the <br />overall reduction of GHG emissions statewide. The proposed project's maximum annual <br />emissions are 507 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents from project operations. <br />This accounts for 0.0001 percent of California's GHG emissions. GHG emissions from <br />construction of the project would peak at approximately 2,371 pounds per day, with <br />emissions for the whole construction period totaling 247.4 metric tons. These amounts <br />are so small that they do not conflict with, or impede implementation of, AB 32, SB 375, <br />or any other plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG <br />emissions. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. (EIR, p. 4 -48, 4 -49.) <br />Further, an analysis of impacts to existing carbon sequestration resulting from the <br />removal of the majority of the site's orange tree orchard was completed. This analysis <br />determined that up to 1,300 metric tons of GHGs could be sequestered by the existing <br />orchard. When the project's estimated GHG emissions are combined with the loss of <br />sequestration, the overall project impact increases to 1,807 metric tons of GHG emissions <br />per year. (January 2014 EIR Attachment, pp. 9 -10, Table 1) However, the analysis also <br />determined that this increased total is still insignificant when compared against the State <br />13 "Exhibit A" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.