My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 85B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
10/07/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 85B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2014 5:37:29 PM
Creation date
10/7/2014 5:20:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
85B
Date
10/7/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Sean Nelson <br />County Board of Supervisors <br />August 28, 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />secondary impacts of the proposed Shelter were adamantly opposed to the site <br />selection. They were most concerned that the presence of a Shelter, in a <br />neighborhood already facing issues of poverty, density, lack of open space, and other <br />public safety concerns, would only escalate the existing difficult conditions previously <br />mentioned. <br />Additionally, it was also clear that most of the residents that live nearest to the <br />proposed Shelter felt ignored and marginalized by the public outreach efforts made. <br />As we know, simply following the "protocols" or "black letter" requirements for <br />purposes of notice does not always render the most effective results. Here, although <br />notices were sent to property owners two weeks prior to the County's only <br />Community Forum to discuss the Shelter, a cursory review of the area surrounding <br />the Shelter clearly shows that the vast majority of the residents are renters in multi- <br />family complexes. Notices to these residents were mailed only three business days <br />prior to the Community Forum. As a result, the most impacted residents were not <br />given sufficient notice of the Community Forum because they were tenants, not <br />property owners. <br />Moreover, the County's sole Community Forum was scheduled on July 2, 2014; only <br />two days before a long holiday weekend. Not surprisingly, the Forum was poorly <br />attended, and therefore did not produce for the Board accurate findings to base its <br />decision to acquire. However, more importantly, it gave the appearance that the <br />County's only effort to engage the community, and give the neighbors an <br />opportunity to be heard, was simply a veiled attempt to circumvent the public's <br />Input. <br />Finally, I forward this written correspondence to your attention in hopes that your <br />will reflect on the responsibility you have to all our County's residents; especially <br />those most near the proposed Shelter. I urge you to reconsider your site selection <br />and approach to addressing the needs of the County's homeless without further <br />impacting our most vulnerable communities. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ate' v <br />Vincen Sa iento <br />Councilmember <br />C. County Board of Supervisors <br />Senator Lou Correa <br />Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez <br />Assemblymember Tom Daly <br />Mayor and City Council <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.