My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
85AA - CONSIDER OPTIONS FOR HOMELESS SHELTER
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
10/21/2014
>
85AA - CONSIDER OPTIONS FOR HOMELESS SHELTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2014 5:31:03 PM
Creation date
10/16/2014 4:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Item #
85AA
Date
10/21/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2. <br />• Request for more information on cities that have established SB2 Zoning and list of all <br />shelters providing services to OC homeless population to county staff from Susana C. <br />Sandoval. Email to county staff, Juanita Preciado, dated Oct. 1, 2014. Attachment # 6 <br />• Email to Karen Roper requesting Environmental Impact Report and federal <br />environmental justice strategies as mandated by President Clinton in Executive Order <br />dated 1994 ( important because federal funds are being used in connection with the <br />project), emailed August 19, 2014. * These studies have not been done, and county <br />received an Exemption for CEQA (CA Environmental Quality Act). Attachment # 7 <br />• CEQA Notice of Exemption Approved, August 13, 2014. Attachment # 8 <br />• Packet to Elected Officials with cover letter requesting stop to escrow/ homeless shelter <br />location with several attachments documenting poor outreach to the community, and <br />lack of community involvement in process: residents, parents at the surrounding 7 <br />schools and business owners. Attachment # 9 <br />• S82 Ordinance Service Providers /Stakeholders Meeting, May 23, 2012. Very important <br />issues raised and best practice recommendations. Need to revisit these and see what <br />has been accomplished and status on best practice recommendations. Of profound <br />concern are: (1) Need for multiple locations and providers, (2) Find ways for cities to <br />do their "fair share ", (3) What are the environmental safety issues?, (4) Has there <br />been a meeting with business and industrial owners? *Additionally attendees did not <br />include residents and parents, Civic Center Round Table — Homeless participants (from <br />what we can understand from the names listed). We do not see the names of Tim <br />Houchen, Carl Brown, Brizy May, or Massimo Marini - - -- individuals who are advocates <br />for the homeless population (as per statements made — Voice of OC on June 16, 2014 <br />and Register on July 15, 2014), or business owners from sectors throughout the city (as <br />far as we can determine only providers of homeless shelters and service providers <br />targeted for the homeless — all important but business owners from industrial areas <br />and other sectors of city not included) . Attachment # 10 <br />• Model Homeless Shelters and Multi Service Programs in the USA: (1) Path Making it a <br />Home and Path Mall Multi Services — LA county and others, (2) Housing Works Program <br />in Utah, (3) Pathway to Housing in a variety of states —for homeless who suffer from <br />psychiatric disabilities, (4) Denver, 53,192 square foot Multi Service Health Center with <br />78 apartments to place homeless (59 one bedroom, and 19 two bedroom), and <br />Illumination Foundation — Stanton Multi- Service Center and soon to open in Santa Ana, <br />and places individuals and families in smaller housing units. <br />85AA -7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.