Laserfiche WebLink
LG -07 -14 -0067 City of Santa Ana <br />LG- Statement of Need <br />IMLS Completed Review Report <br />This proposal focuses on the increasing diversity in four communities and how to connect with those <br />immigrant communities using the library as an anchor. By engaging with the teenagers in immigrant <br />communities to research and record migration stories, Memories of Migration will preserve these important <br />histories and make them available to the larger community. More importantly, the project aims to make <br />immigrants feel more connected to their local community, train them in STEM fields, increase digital literacy, <br />and have libraries serve as community anchors. <br />LG- Impact <br />This project stands to have a significant impact within the four communities taking part-Santa Ana, CA; <br />Queens, NY; West Hartford, CT; and New Mexico. It also is designed to be scalable for other communities <br />that may want to adopt it or parts of it. Its focus on collaboration seems designed to support other <br />communities that might want to implement Memories of Migration. It is less clear that the project can be <br />broadly adapted for other subjects. The applicants may want to consider which parts of this project could be <br />used for a focus besides immigrant communities and their migration histories. It seems that many of the <br />pieces of this project could be used for community engagement based around different topics such as urban <br />development or architectural history. <br />LG- Project Design <br />This is an ambitious project that has many moving parts. I have some concerns about the ability to <br />successfully manage and coordinate a project of this size spread across the county in four different <br />communities. The project management will have to be carefully attended to in order to make sure that the <br />goals are being successfully met and the budget allocations are in line with this proposal. Clearly time and <br />attention went into this very detailed proposal; that same time and attention will be necessary throughout the <br />project to keep its many parts on track. <br />LG- Project Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />The work of the project seems reasonably spread across the four participating communities, and the main <br />people have allotted what seems to be a significant amount of time to handle the work items. The work also <br />seems to be spread across many people, not the responsibility of just a few. Much of the budget is covered <br />through cost share. The participating organizations will need to be mindful that the cost share funds are being <br />appropriately allocated and match with the work being done. Both the amount of money allocated and the <br />number of people involved will need careful oversight. <br />LG- Communications Plan <br />The project has a multi- tiered communications strategy that should help it reach a large audience. It seems <br />ideally suited to take advantage of social media for its communication because it would help target the <br />teenage population they are working with. Tools such as Twitter and Facebook that teenagers are <br />comfortable with would allow them to spread the word about the project and share tips and suggestions. I <br />would suggest that the applicants consider a hashtag that could be used by teenagers in the four <br />communities to communicate with each other about their work and progress. <br />LG-Susta inability <br />I have some concerns about how the individual libraries are going to maintain the digital portion of this <br />project. The proposal notes that the Internet Archive will handle the long -term digital preservation of the <br />material. However, the project will only be hosted on Historypin for a year beyond the grant timeframe; it is <br />unclear what will happen after that time. It is also unclear how new technologies and formats will be <br />integrated into the project over time or how the content might be migrated to different technologies when <br />necessary. The applicants need to give more thought to the maintenance and upkeep of the websites over <br />the long term so the websites do not become abandone�ftu years <br />'• ; + ® °s <br />••••;: <br />INSTITUTE of <br />tt� <br />1Y useuma.libriaiy <br />SERVICES <br />e s <br />LG -07 -14 -0067 City of Santa Ana <br />LG- Statement of Need <br />IMLS Completed Review Report <br />This proposal focuses on the increasing diversity in four communities and how to connect with those <br />immigrant communities using the library as an anchor. By engaging with the teenagers in immigrant <br />communities to research and record migration stories, Memories of Migration will preserve these important <br />histories and make them available to the larger community. More importantly, the project aims to make <br />immigrants feel more connected to their local community, train them in STEM fields, increase digital literacy, <br />and have libraries serve as community anchors. <br />LG- Impact <br />This project stands to have a significant impact within the four communities taking part-Santa Ana, CA; <br />Queens, NY; West Hartford, CT; and New Mexico. It also is designed to be scalable for other communities <br />that may want to adopt it or parts of it. Its focus on collaboration seems designed to support other <br />communities that might want to implement Memories of Migration. It is less clear that the project can be <br />broadly adapted for other subjects. The applicants may want to consider which parts of this project could be <br />used for a focus besides immigrant communities and their migration histories. It seems that many of the <br />pieces of this project could be used for community engagement based around different topics such as urban <br />development or architectural history. <br />LG- Project Design <br />This is an ambitious project that has many moving parts. I have some concerns about the ability to <br />successfully manage and coordinate a project of this size spread across the county in four different <br />communities. The project management will have to be carefully attended to in order to make sure that the <br />goals are being successfully met and the budget allocations are in line with this proposal. Clearly time and <br />attention went into this very detailed proposal; that same time and attention will be necessary throughout the <br />project to keep its many parts on track. <br />LG- Project Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />The work of the project seems reasonably spread across the four participating communities, and the main <br />people have allotted what seems to be a significant amount of time to handle the work items. The work also <br />seems to be spread across many people, not the responsibility of just a few. Much of the budget is covered <br />through cost share. The participating organizations will need to be mindful that the cost share funds are being <br />appropriately allocated and match with the work being done. Both the amount of money allocated and the <br />number of people involved will need careful oversight. <br />LG- Communications Plan <br />The project has a multi- tiered communications strategy that should help it reach a large audience. It seems <br />ideally suited to take advantage of social media for its communication because it would help target the <br />teenage population they are working with. Tools such as Twitter and Facebook that teenagers are <br />comfortable with would allow them to spread the word about the project and share tips and suggestions. I <br />would suggest that the applicants consider a hashtag that could be used by teenagers in the four <br />communities to communicate with each other about their work and progress. <br />LG-Susta inability <br />I have some concerns about how the individual libraries are going to maintain the digital portion of this <br />project. The proposal notes that the Internet Archive will handle the long -term digital preservation of the <br />material. However, the project will only be hosted on Historypin for a year beyond the grant timeframe; it is <br />unclear what will happen after that time. It is also unclear how new technologies and formats will be <br />integrated into the project over time or how the content might be migrated to different technologies when <br />necessary. The applicants need to give more thought to the maintenance and upkeep of the websites over <br />the long term so the websites do not become abandone�ftu years <br />