Laserfiche WebLink
HARBOR BLVD. MIXED USE TRANSIT CORRIDOR PLAN FINAL FIR <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Table of Contents <br />Table <br />Table 1 -1 <br />Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures and Levels of <br />Significance After Mitigation . <br />1 -9 <br />Table 3 -1 <br />Land Use Districts and Buddout Projections for the Harbor Corridor Plan . <br />3 -13 <br />Table 3 -2 <br />Buddout Projections for Parcels Proposed to Be Converted to Conventional <br />Zoning. <br />3 -14 <br />Table 4 -1 <br />North Harbor Specific Plan Land Use Summary . <br />4 -7 <br />Table 4 -2 <br />General Plan Projections. <br />4 -9 <br />Table 52 -1 <br />Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants ..................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 52 -7 <br />Table 52 -2 <br />Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin-------- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 52 -10 <br />Table 52 -3 <br />Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Summary------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- <br />52 -11 <br />Table 52 -4 <br />Existing Land Uses------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- <br />52 -12 <br />Table 52 -5 <br />SCAQMD Significance Thresholds-------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />52 -13 <br />Table 52 -6 <br />SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds ................................................. ......................... <br />. . . . .. 52 -14 <br />Table 52 -7 <br />SCAQMD Toxic Air Contaminants Incremental Risk Thresholds-------------- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 52 -14 <br />Table 52 -8 <br />Construction Regional Emissions ....................................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 52 -16 <br />Table 52 -9 <br />Maximum Daily Operational Phase Regional Emissions ............................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 52 -17 <br />Table 52 -10 <br />CARB Recommendations for Siting New Sensitive Land Uses-------------------- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 52 -19 <br />Table 5.4 -1 <br />Estimated Relationship between Peak Ground Acceleration and Intensity-- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.4 -3 <br />Table 5.5 -1 <br />GHG and Their Relative Global Warming Potential Compared to CO2------------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.5 -2 <br />Table 5.5 -2 <br />Summary of Global Climate Change Risks to California ................................. ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.5 -5 <br />Table 5.5 -3 <br />Scoping Plan GHG Reduction Measures and Reductions toward 2020 Target-------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.5 -8 <br />Table 5.5 -4 <br />Annual Operational Phase GHG Emissions .................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.5 -14 <br />Table 5.6 -1 <br />Environmental Database Listings within the Project Area------------------------------------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.6 -7 <br />Table 5.6 -2 <br />Offsite Environmental Database Listings within 0.25 Mile of the Project Site ......................... <br />5.6 -12 <br />Table 5.7 -1 <br />Existing Project Area Drainage System and Capacities ............................................................. <br />. . . . .. 5.7 -9 <br />Table 5.7 -2 <br />Beneficial Uses of Receiving Waters ........................................................................................... <br />. . . . .. 5.7 -11 <br />Table 5.7 -3 <br />Water Quality Impairments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.7 -12 <br />Table5.7 -4 <br />Future Pipe Capacity--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.7 -22 <br />Table5.7 -5 <br />Construction BMPs----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.7 -23 <br />Table 5.7 -6 <br />Anticipated and Potential Pollutants Generated by Land Use Type------------------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.7 -24 <br />Table 5.7 -7 <br />Categories of BMPs in WQMPs------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.7 -25 <br />Table 5.8 -1 <br />General Plan Consistency Analysis----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.8 -5 <br />Table 5.8 -2 <br />Consistency with SCAG's 2012 -2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable <br />Communities Strategy Goals---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.8 -12 <br />Table 5.8 -3 <br />SCAG Compass Growth Vision Consistency Analysis .................................. ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.8 -14 <br />Table 5.9 -1 <br />Change in Sound Pressure Level, dB ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5-9 -2 <br />Table 5.9 -2 <br />Typical Noise Levels from Noise Sources .......................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -3 <br />Table 5.9 -3 <br />City of Santa Ana Noise Element Standards ............................................................................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -5 <br />Table 5.9 -4 <br />City of Santa Ana Exterior Noise Standards ............................................................................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -5 <br />Table 5.9 -5 <br />Ground home Vibration and Noise Impact Criteria: Human Annoyance--- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.9 -6 <br />Table 5.9 -6 <br />Ground Borne Vibration and Noise Impact Criteria: Structural Damage ---- ------------------------- <br />- - - - -- 5.9 -6 <br />Table 5.9 -7 <br />Project- Related Traffic Noise, Existing Conditions ................................................................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -9 <br />Table 5.9 -8 <br />Long Term Traffic Noise Increases ................................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -11 <br />Table 5.9 -9 <br />Construction Equipment Vibration Levels ....................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -15 <br />Table 5.9 -10 <br />Construction Equipment Noise Levels ............................................................. ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.9 -18 <br />Table 5.10 -1 <br />Population Projections, 2010 - 2035 .................................................................... ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.10 -1 <br />Table 5.10-2 <br />Housing Units and Households, Santa Ana and Orange County, 2013, CDF <br />Estimate--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- <br />5.10 -2 <br />Table 5.10 -3 <br />Housing Units Projections, 2010 - 2035 ............................................................. ......................... <br />. . . . .. 5.10 -2 <br />Page viii PlaceWorkr <br />