2014-069 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2014-01

Home Browse Search

HARBOR BLVD. MIXED USE TRANSIT CORRIDOR PLAN FINAL FIR CITY OF SANTA ANA 8. Impacts Found Not to Be Significant Table 8 -1 Impacts Found Not to Be Significant IX. HYDROLOGY AND WAI ER QUALI I Y. Would the project: I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? I No Impact a) Environmental Issues Initial Study Determination e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has No Impact not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, Less Than Significant Impact A. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a project area? No Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a No Impact Ressult in the loss, of availability of a locally important minerQal resource recovery safety hazard for people residin or working in the project area? b) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency Less Than Significant Impact construction of replacement housing elsewhere? response lanoremer en evacuation Ian? c) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving replacement housing elsewhere? wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacentto urbanized areas or No Impact where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic IX. HYDROLOGY AND WAI ER QUALI I Y. Would the project: I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? I No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact c) Conflictwith any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community No Impact conservation plan? A. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: excessive noise levels? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a No Impact No Impact value to there ion and the residents of the state? people residing orworking in the project area to excessive noise levels? b) Ressult in the loss, of availability of a locally important minerQal resource recovery No Impact b) ond Less Than Significant Impact e) ror a progea locaiea wlmin an airport Jana use plan or, wnere sucn a plan nas not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, Less Than Significant Impact would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose No Impact people residing orworking in the project area to excessive noise levels? All. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the Less Than Significant Impact construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of Less Than Significant Impact replacement housing elsewhere? XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic No Impact levels or a thane in location that results in substantial safety risks? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? I Less Than Significant Impact XVIL UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Less Than Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact October 2014 Page 8 -3