Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana, CA I �1JATER RATE STUDY <br />Pipe Vintage (Age) <br />Although the Pipe Cohorts were the single most critical aspect of the PoF Score, it was important to also <br />consider the age of a pipeline without regard for material. As shown in Figure B - 26 below — which <br />displays the number of breaks per 100 miles per year since 1990 for water system pipelines installed in <br />each decade — pipes installed prior to 1940 were shown to have more than 6 breaks per hundred miles <br />per year. For pipes installed after 1940, the number of breaks per hundred miles per year steadily <br />decreased based on installation year, from more than 4 for pipes installed in the 1950s to less than 1 for <br />pipes installed in the 1990s and 2000s. <br />Figure B - 26 provides a map of water mains highlighting those pipes that have not had CCTV <br />inspections. Depending on the asset management strategy used, the City may want to target future <br />inspections on those uninspected mains or on those mains having high -risk conditions. Performing <br />repeated inspections every few years provides valuable insight into the rate of change. <br />Figure B - 26: Water Pipeline Historical Break Rate by Installation Decade <br />Because the age of the pipelines clearly plays an integral role in the overall probability of a failure <br />occurring, pipeline installation year was included as 40 percent of the initial PoF Score. Pipe age <br />considerations were assigned as follows: <br />• Pipes installed before 1940 were assigned a score of 10 <br />• Pipes installed in 1940 or after were assigned a decreasing linear score from 10 to 1 <br />• 1970s and 1980s Ductile Pipe was considered 0 percent <br />BLACK &VEATCH I Appendix8: Water CIP Prioritiza?lo,� P, -1 -',s <br />65B -123 <br />111 <br />