My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/02/2014
>
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 8:46:02 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 3:35:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
65B
Date
12/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
126 <br />WATER RATE STUDY I City of Santa Ana, CA <br />Figure C- 2: BRE Heat Map Graphic by Main Replacement cost (2012 dollars) <br />O) <br />L <br />LL <br />4- <br />O <br />4J <br />U <br />i <br />GJ <br />Cr <br />O <br />H <br />O <br />V <br />1 <br />10 $0.8 <br />9 $0.3 <br />8 $1.2 <br />7 $0.3 <br />6 $1.1 <br />5 $4.3 <br />Probability of Failure <br />2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <br />4 $20.9 $18.5 $11.7 $55.7 $6.7 $44.8 $21.3 $12.0 <br />3 i $4.1 ( $2.5 1 $3.9 $22.0 $1.2 $4.8 $3.1 $4.2 <br />$0.9 <br />$5.4 <br />$0.9 $0.9 <br />2 $38.7 $25.2 $15.3 $91.4 $12.8 $35.5 $18.9 $11.5 $3.4 $4.9 <br />1 $1.7 $6.0 $9.2 $753 $24.5 $54.3 $47.4 $26.8 $4.0 $3.0 <br />Millions of Dollars Total Cost: $973.2 <br />WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM R &R PRIORITIZATION <br />Up to this point the analysis focused on assessing the likely condition of the water distribution system <br />mains based on available source data. PoF and CoF scores were combined into an overall risk score for <br />each pipe segment. Using these results the study then took on a different focus; that of prioritizing pipe <br />inspections and /or replacements and grouping those pipe segments into probable R &R projects. These <br />steps include: <br />• BRE Replacement Prioritization: each pipe segment ranked from highest to lowest risk and <br />assigned a full replacement cost estimate. It gives equal consideration for both PoF and CoF <br />factors. Although useful information, this listing is generally not used for actual replacement <br />planning or budgeting. <br />• R &R Strategy Groups and CIP Budgeting: pipe segments assigned to various inspection and /or <br />replacement strategies applied to address differing risk considerations. Based on the suggested <br />R &R activity for each strategy group, annual inspection and replacement budgets were <br />developed. These results are sufficient for general budgetary planning. However, since <br />prioritized pipe segments may be highly segmented and scattered across the service area, this <br />summery is only partially useful for detailed planning. Adjusting the assumptions made here can <br />create a variety of budgeting scenarios. <br />65B -138 <br />NOVEMBER 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.