Laserfiche WebLink
130 <br />WATER RATE STUDY I City of Santa Ana, CA <br />Rank <br />126 <br />Unique <br />Pipe ID <br />11567 <br />Material <br />CI <br />Size <br />(in) <br />18 <br />Year <br />Installed <br />1939 <br />Decade <br />19306 <br />Length <br />(miles) <br />0.07 <br />Cohort <br />Rank <br />3 <br />PoF <br />Score <br />7.6 <br />CoF <br />Score <br />7.0 <br />BRE <br />53.2 <br />Estimated <br />Cost <br />$165,359 <br />127 <br />11588 <br />CI <br />18 <br />1939 <br />1930s <br />0.88 <br />3 <br />7.6 <br />7.0 <br />53.2 <br />$2,025,202 <br />128 <br />4689 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$4,467 <br />129 <br />4690 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19806 <br />0.02 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$36,392 <br />130 <br />4694 <br />DI <br />14 <br />1982 <br />19806 <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$9,883 <br />131 <br />4183 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$636 <br />132 <br />4184 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19806 <br />0.03 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$50,949 <br />133 <br />4845 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.12 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$230,867 <br />134 <br />7128 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1988 <br />19805 <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />1 50.0 <br />$1,271 <br />135 <br />7129 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1988 <br />1 19806 <br />0.00 <br />1 5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$2,964 <br />136 <br />7130 <br />1 DI <br />12 <br />1988 <br />1980s <br />0.08 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$153,953 <br />137 <br />7863 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1987 <br />1980s <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$164 <br />138 <br />11392 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.02 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$38,226 <br />139 <br />11393 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.03 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$56,080 <br />140 <br />13145 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1987 <br />19806 <br />0.05 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$91,806 <br />141 <br />19868 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19806 <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$464 <br />142 <br />19992 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />1980s <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$1,362 <br />143 <br />20025 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1988 <br />19806 <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$1,441 <br />144 <br />37932 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19806 <br />0.02 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$41,267 <br />145 <br />37816 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19809 <br />0.04 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$83,702 <br />146 <br />37819 <br />DI <br />12 <br />1989 <br />19806 <br />0.00 <br />5 <br />10.0 <br />5.0 <br />50.0 <br />$220 <br />R &R STRATEGY GROUPS AND CIP BUDGETING <br />The risk prioritization table just presented identifies pipe segments having the highest BRE score. Since <br />this score is based on the product of PoF times CoF factors, it gives equal consideration for both factors. <br />Typically, different R &R strategies are applied to address these two considerations. <br />Based on the BRE heat map graphic results, the ranked assets were then grouped into logical R &R <br />strategies. Figure C - 3 shows the same BRE heat map graphic as before, but color coded by strategy <br />group. Figure C - 4 shows a map of the mains color -coded by Strategy Group (A -Z). Table C - 3 defines <br />each of these groupings and provides additional summarizations and recommendations. <br />65B -142 <br />NOVEMBER 2014 <br />