My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/02/2014
>
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 8:46:02 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 3:35:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
65B
Date
12/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana, CA I SEWER RATE STUDY <br />The National Association of Sewer Service Companies ( NASSCO) has developed a standardized system of <br />ratings to provide a consistent assessment of sanitary sewer conditions. Known as the Pipeline <br />Assessment Condition Program (PACP), the system provides the capability to benchmark sewer <br />conditions in order track deterioration over time. Using the PACP process allows utilities to identify <br />major deterioration factors and assign a rating reflecting the likelihood of collapse. CCTV data only <br />provides information on the internal defects that affect condition. Utilities need additional information <br />to fully assess the condition of a main. The PACP process classifies deterioration factors in "structural' <br />defects and "O &M" defects. Ratings are based on a 5 -point system with 1 being "excellent condition — <br />minor defects" and 5 being "immediate action — pipe will likely fail in less than 5 years." Table 6 <br />summarizes the NASCCO PACP Rating system. <br />Table 6: NASCCO PACP Rating System <br />1 <br />Excellent <br />Minor defects <br />Defects that have <br />2 <br />not started <br />Good <br />deteriorating <br />Moderate defects <br />3 <br />that will continue to <br />Fair <br />deteriorate <br />4 <br />Poor <br />Severe defects <br />5 <br />Immediate <br />Defect requires <br />Attention <br />immediate action <br />Unlikely in the <br />foreseeable future No cracks <br />Unlikely to fail for at Some longitudinal <br />least 20 years cracking visible <br />May fail in 30 to 20 <br />years <br />Probably will fail in <br />5 to 10 years <br />Has failed or likely <br />will fail within the <br />next 5 years <br />Multiple fractures <br />Broken pipe <br />Collapsed pipe <br />Free of roots and <br />deposits <br />Fine roots present <br />Capacity decrease of up <br />to 15 percent due to <br />deposits <br />Infiltration occurring <br />Root ball decreasing <br />flow capacity by up to <br />50 percent <br />Figures 2 and 3 present the CCTV for the City's sewer system using the "Quick Structural Rating" (QSR) <br />and "Quick Maintenance Rating" (QMR) values calculated based on the rating process in Table 6. Black & <br />Veatch notes that while QMR ratings provide useful information regarding maintenance practices, Black <br />& Veatch did not use them as part of the prioritization process. Operational and local FOG (fats, oils and <br />grease) issues rather than installation materials, structural conditions or probability of failure <br />considerations, impact QMR scores more. <br />BLACK & VEATCH I Sewer Rate Study <br />65B -186 <br />VIVA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.