My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/02/2014
>
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 8:46:02 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 3:35:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
65B
Date
12/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
76 <br />SEWER RATE STUDY I City of Santa Ana, CA <br />CCTV Observations, Sewer Spills and Repairs <br />The City has been performing CCTV inspections on about 70 miles of pipe each year. This equates to <br />about a 6 -7 year cycle to cover the entire system. figure B 9 provides a map of sewer mains color coded <br />by CCTV inspection year. <br />The GIS database includes information compiled from CCTV inspections over the years. About 78 <br />percent of the sewer system includes at least some inspection - related data. This information is very <br />useful in that it provides the most accurate assessment of the facilities current (recent) condition and <br />expectation for failure. The CCTV data also provides key indications related to ongoing operational / <br />maintenance considerations. In general, the City has used these observations to identify sections of <br />sewer to line or clean. However, it has not been used for risk assessment. <br />Having the latest CCTV inspection results are critical in assessing current pipeline conditions. However, <br />by comparing these results to prior inspections, one can also gain a better understanding of the rate of <br />changes occurring. In some cases the presence of a pipe defect may not be much of an issue if it has <br />been in the same condition for many years; perhaps even since construction. Over time, the City will be <br />able to see trends in the deterioration of pipe to better project future replacement rates. Therefore, <br />Black & Veatch strongly recommends the City implement a process for storing and assessing prior <br />inspection data as well as the latest data set. <br />The "Quick Structural Rating" (QSR) and "Quick Maintenance Rating' (QMR) values calculated based on <br />the review of CCTV inspections are especially useful to this assessment study. Therefore, these factors <br />have been addressed in their own sections below. <br />Some of the CCTV observation data includes indications of pipeline problems, such as structural issues <br />and grease or root issues. Of the structure issues listed, about 13 percent of all pipes in the collection <br />system have at least one location that is broken, cracked, fractured, or has a hole or offset. Almost 29 <br />percent of the pipe records are listed as having no structural defects. The remaining 58 percent had no <br />structural issues value (not inspected or no recorded value). <br />For grease, over 53 percent of all system lines are shown as being clean, about 29 percent have light <br />grease, and only about 3 percent are listed at medium or heavy. The remaining 15 percent had no <br />grease issue value. Roots show a similar status: 63 percent at none, 21 percent at light, and about 1 <br />percent are listed at medium or heavy. The remaining 15 percent had no roots issue value. <br />65B -235 <br />NOVEMBER 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.