Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana, CA I SEWER RATE STUDY <br />strengths of pipe have been made over the 150 years that clay has been used in the United States. (from <br />www.ncyi.org/fags.asi3#faall). The installation method and backfill material also has a significant <br />impact on its likelihood of failure. Any movement on the infrastructure or the surrounding sub -soil may <br />also lead to stress fractures. <br />An evaluation of the City's pipe data on materials, age, QSR ranks, etc. was performed to identify likely <br />pipe cohorts. This evaluation included trends as observed in the source data (especially the QSR <br />inspection ranks by materials) and also general past performance knowledge of similar materials in <br />similar environments. <br />Based on a review of the analysis results above, it was concluded that a significant factor influencing the <br />likelihood of failure for the City's sewer mains is age (vintage); especially considering that almost 90 <br />percent of the mains are made of Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). The following pipe cohorts were developed <br />as logical grouping of pipes having similar deterioration rates. The associated Cohort Rank is also <br />included. These ranks were then multiplied by two to create a range of 1 to 10 (for overall PoF <br />calculation). <br />• Cohort 5, High: All sewer pipelines installed before 1946 <br />• Cohort 4, Med -High: All pipes with an unknown installation year <br />• Cohort 3, Med: All pipes (except PVC and High Density Polyethylene) installed between 1946 <br />and 1975 <br />• Cohort 2, Med -Low: All pipes (except PVC and High Density Polyethylene) installed after 1975 <br />• Cohort 1, Low: All PVC and High Density Polyethylene pipes installed after 1946 and any pipes <br />which have been lined since their original installation <br />As a precaution, all pipe materials with unknown installation year were assigned a rank of Medium High <br />(4). The City is encouraged to investigate further to identify these missing dates. This might be <br />accomplished by reviewing appropriate as -built drawings, or assuming install years based on <br />neighborhood construction periods or adjacent pipe attributes. This effort was beyond the scope of this <br />investigation. Once installation year data is identified, these pipe segments may likely acquire lower <br />Cohort ranks. <br />Lined pipe (including: Felt Liner, Fold Form PVC Liner, Fiber Glass Liner, and Spiral Wound Liner) data is <br />stored in the pipe material field. Therefore, actual pipe material is unknown. Also, the timing of pipeline <br />lining is often unclear. Therefore, it was assumed that any CCTV inspection data referred to the pipe <br />conditions prior to lining. Once lined, the pipe was assumed to have been "fixed" and is currently in very <br />good structure condition. Thus all lined pipe was assigned a Low (1) rating. <br />Figure B 20 provides a graph of pipe cohort ranks (1 -5) and associated total pipe lengths (miles) for each <br />rank. This distribution shows that the majority (68 %) of the sewer pipes fell into Cohort 3, as they were <br />non - plastic pipes installed between 1946 and 1975. Figure B 21 provides a map of sewer mains color <br />coded by Cohort Rank. <br />BLACK & VEATCH I Appendix B: Sewer CIP Prioritization Process <br />65B -250 <br />