Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana, CAI WATER RATE STUDY <br />Algorithm used by the CAMPS model: <br />■ If Condition Rating = 3, then compare (calculate Remaining Useful Life = Replacement <br />Year - Current Year) with (calculate (50% x Useful Life) + Current Year) and use largest <br />value for Replacement Year. <br />To continue to refine and improve these class -based useful life estimates, which have a large impact on <br />funding strategy analysis, Black & Veatch recommends initiating an infrastructure risk analysis and <br />condition - monitoring program. Leading asset management practices within the infrastructure <br />management industry are to monitor the condition of assets, using a prioritization approach. Such an <br />approach may consist of beginning with those assets where assets are past or nearing the end of their <br />expected useful. Another key element in risk management would be to conduct condition monitoring on <br />those assets posing the greatest risk to the City, should the asset fail. Provided later in this report is <br />further discussion of risk analysis and condition monitoring. <br />Refurbishment programs, intervals and cost <br />Most asset classes require various capital refurbishments on a cyclic basis in order to sustain or extend <br />the asset's useful lives. Pump stations, for example, can be expected to undergo pump refurbishment, <br />motor overhaul, replacement of electric components, and mechanical overhaul at intervals shorter than <br />the cycle for the replacement of assets themselves. Appropriate refurbishment intervals and costs that <br />are considered major (non - operational /annual) expenditures, were developed for specific asset classes. <br />Replacement costs <br />For each asset class and for specific assets where required, Black & Veatch estimated the base -year <br />(FY2013) replacement cost. Black & Veatch's estimates are based on the experience of our engineers, <br />construction cost estimates recently prepared for other clients, industry standards, and our experience <br />with other agencies. <br />Where possible, replacement costs, were defined in terms of unit costs to facilitate the class -based <br />estimating approach (examples include dollars per foot of various types of pipe, dollars per gallon for <br />storage facilities, and dollars per square foot for buildings of various classes). <br />For Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 34 compliance, Black & Veatch has included <br />factors to include ancillary costs such as planning, design, site development, and internal administrative <br />costs where appropriate for the types of assets. <br />The Asset Class Library, along with the asset inventory were the key input for projecting capital asset <br />R &R needs. <br />DEVELOPMENT OF REFURBISHMENT AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULES AND <br />COSTS <br />Black & Veatch used its Comprehensive Asset Management Prioritization System (CAMPS) Model in <br />conjunction with risk profile analysis to develop the R &R schedules presented in this report. The R &R <br />schedules project the capitalized refurbishment, and replacement costs (in 2012 dollars) needed to <br />sustain the water infrastructure managed by the City. Black & Veatch then escalated costs for each <br />BLACK & VEATCH I Appendix A: Refurbishment & Replacement Program 65 <br />65B -77 <br />