Laserfiche WebLink
R�rl1R r1vn►►�c.R <br />Honorable Mayor, Council /;, 11 Det dR5 <br />=, Robert C. Bobb Ci Man -- NOV 1 5 1985 <br />bject: ORANGE COUNPY MAJOR TRANSPORTATION OMRTDM rRF VPdrRAM a <br />sip, V ICES <br />On November -18, a .discussion �of the Orange County Transportation Corridor Fee <br />Program, will be held with the City Council. 71he�urpose.is,#,o -as sess" the issues <br />associated° with' participation- in- the--aoint-raers Auth ri'ti-es-far-the- <br />Faotlilll�Eastefn an3' San- Joaquin�iills�tsarispirt3tion Corridors. During the <br />workshop, a process will be reviewed which will,.inform property owners, <br />developers and the oonmunity -at -large of the program elements and their implica- <br />tions for the City of Santa Ana. The first meeting of the Joint powers <br />Authority for the corridor Dias been scheduled for January 23. As is referenced <br />in the attached metro trran Dave Grosse and as will be discussed in detail at the <br />workshcp,iwe anticipate,that a citizen's information process for the City of <br />Santa Ana will take approximately three months prior to-final action by the City <br />Council. <br />CITIZEN INFORMATION PROCESS <br />Since the City of Santa Ana is accountable to our residents to ensure quality <br />representation in matters, including transportation, which directly impact their <br />quality of life, decisions associated with participating in the Joint powers <br />Authority should be made with--as wide -a-base- of- snforma�Eion-fran- our -resilden -Es <br />as apossible. Staff is reccamending holding workshops - #or- major- affected <br />property owners, including Henry Segerstram, Santa Fe Properties, Sakioka Farms, <br />Arnel Properties, and Schmeider— Hutton Center. All other property owners will <br />have to be notified through mailing. The -Transportation -Advisory - Cannission, <br />the -- Planning -C='nission- and the ""development --Ga n ssion-ere -appropriate - forums <br />for -the discussion of the-T ransportatien-Corridor 'Fee'Progran. We intern to <br />provide the Council with a calendar of dates for the series of meetings which <br />will be held for the benefit of the ccrnnunity. <br />CITY OF SWM ANA POLICY SIATEMERT <br />On March 18, 1985 the Santa Ana Council adopted a policy statement which set <br />forth the concerns of the City regarding the proposed County development fee <br />program. That statement in part;as presented in letters to Stan Oftelie, <br />Executive Director of the Orange County Transportation Coiimissirn, and to the <br />.Board of Supervisors by the Mayor nn behalf of the Council stated:. <br />... The Council recognizes the need to generate additional sources of revenue <br />and supports the concept of developer fees as an appropriate means to <br />counteract the costs of transportation development and provide a funding <br />mix for solutions. However, while recognizing these needs on a countywide <br />perspective, there remain certain conditions and concerns which must be <br />addressed as part of the execution of any agreements of participation on <br />the part of the city of Santa Ana ... these include - the impact of <br />construction ... on urban sprawl and traffic congestion ....Eand3 the <br />,proposed corridor development in relation to the overall Countywide master <br />plan for transportation. <br />