Laserfiche WebLink
to serve increased intensities planned in adopted land use Elements of their General <br />Plan. In the event that such intensities are decreased, and reduction in the level of <br />facility then is still feasible in view of rights of way then acquired, planning, design, <br />engineering and construction then completed and financing commitments made, such <br />fee also will be re- evaluated. The majority of the length of corridor alignments fall <br />within relatively undeveloped areas of the County. Exceptions to this are either end <br />of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and the central segments of the <br />Foothill/Eastem Transportation Corridors. Each corridor traverses areas of hilly <br />terrain. A majority of the areas traversed by the corridors is zoned Planned <br />Community with tentative tracts in various stages of approval. <br />An alignment was selected by the Board of Supervisors for the San Joaquin Hills <br />Transportation Corridor on November 28, 1979 and the northwesterly segment of the <br />Foothill Corridor on May 25, 1983. More detailed engineering work is currently <br />underway on the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor to refine the selected <br />alignment and determine right -of -way requirements. Similar detailed engineering is <br />also in progress for the northwesterly segment of the Foothill Transportation <br />Corridor. Alignment selection studies also are underway on the Eastern Corridor and <br />the southerly end of the Foothill Corridor between about Oso Parkway and 1 -5. <br />It is proposed that all corridors will eventually be added to the State Highway System. <br />State legislation (AB 86) has been signed into law which redescribes State Route 73 <br />(Corona Del Mar Freeway) to include the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor. <br />Legislation (SB 2048 and SB 2049), Chapters 1363 and 1364, respectively, of the <br />Statutes of 1988 also have been enacted which designates the Eastern and Foothill <br />Transportation Corridors as State Routes 231 and 241, respectively. <br />IV. ESTIMATED COSTS <br />The construction costs include estimates for all corridor grading and general travel <br />lane improvements including bridges, structural section, interchanges, partial <br />landscaping, and arterial highway realignments dictated by the corridor alignments. <br />The cost of grading general High- Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes is included but not <br />the cost of HOV structural section, bridges, median barriers or special access ramps. <br />It is intended that implementation of any transit guideway or HOV facilities, if <br />needed, would be provided from other funding sources. <br />Other costs included for both Corridors include engineering design, administration, <br />construction inspection, right -of -way acquisition and some financing costs. <br />It is proposed that developers will dedicate the majority of right -of -way for the <br />transportation corridors. The cost estimate includes a cost for the portion of the right - <br />of -way which would exceed a standard major arterial highway constructed along the <br />corridor alignment excluding slope easements. The portion of right -of -way <br />223512_2DOC <br />