My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65C - PARK RANGER OPTIONS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
01/20/2015
>
65C - PARK RANGER OPTIONS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2015 3:47:23 PM
Creation date
1/15/2015 3:30:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
65C
Date
1/20/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Ranger /Ambassador Options and City Manager Recommendation <br />January 20, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br />Option B, would require rescinding the 60 -day notice of separation to the four part time Park <br />Rangers so they can continue to perform their duties. Whether they continue in Parks and <br />Recreation or begin working in the Police Department, the City would be in violation of the <br />CalPERS rule that CalPERS employers should not hire CalPER retirees for more than a short <br />temporary basis. Continuing to keep the Rangers in the payroll system puts both the retiree and <br />the City at risk. <br />Option C would be to begin recruitment of part time Park Rangers that qualify to carry guns, are <br />not CalPERS retirees, and report to the Police Department. Based on the experience from <br />previous recruitments, the process will be a long one and the outcome of hiring retired Police <br />Officers or Sheriff Deputies from non CaiPERS systems would be expected to be poor. Waiting <br />for hopeful results from this option would delay the implementation of the Park Ambassador <br />Program and the start of enhancing security to the park and recreation facilities by the Police <br />Department though their Park Enforcement Liaison approach. <br />The steps to implement Option A would Involve the Police Department working closely with the <br />Parks and Recreation Agency to ensure all park users and neighborhoods are aware of these <br />new efforts. Both Police and Parks and Recreation will make sure that feedback from the <br />community is taken into consideration as the deployment efforts of Option A takes place. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Affirming Option A of this item allows the City to meet Goal #1 Community Safety and Objective <br />#1, to modernize the Community Policing philosophy to improve customer service, crime <br />prevention and traffic /pedestrian /bicycle safety. The strategy (1b.) will be supported so that that <br />enhancement to the development of a community - policing plan based on community input to <br />deliver crime prevention /community policing /traffic - pedestrian safety programs in a consistent and <br />uniformed manner takes place. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Funding is included in the fiscal year 2014- <br />2015 budget. <br />Gerardo Mouet, <br />Executive Director <br />Parks, Recreation and Community <br />Services Agency <br />Exhibit: Park Ambassador Job Bulletin <br />65C -3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.