Laserfiche WebLink
Response PH3 -6 — Saul O'Campo <br />Regarding safety, concrete barriers with fencing would be placed around the perimeter of <br />construction areas to restrict access and eliminate the threat to safety and security of anyone not <br />directly involved in construction activity. Construction activity would occur in front of Spurgeon <br />Intermediate School, Romero Cruz Elementary School, George Washington Carver Elementary <br />School, and James Garfield Elementary School. Construction zones near schools require additional <br />considerations to ensure the safety of students and staff and promote vehicle awareness. The City <br />of Santa Ana would coordinate with the Santa Ana Unified School District and Santa Ana Police <br />Department to develop and implement a construction traffic safety plan, as identified in Mitigation <br />Measure SAF1 on page 3 -196 of the EA /DEIR, at schools adjacent to the alignment. Precautionary <br />safety features would, as a minimum, include signs, barriers, and crossing and traffic signals to <br />create a safe environment for parents and students during pick -up /drop -off times, as well as the <br />education plan to increase the construction and safety awareness for students and parents. <br />The construction zone would typically be limited between two- and four -block segments. North - <br />south traffic could experience detours or inconveniences from lane reductions, nighttime or <br />weekend closures, and detours. In addition, daytime construction activity in major intersections <br />would occur in increments to avoid complete intersection closure. Accordingly, impacts to direct <br />routes to and from institutional uses would be temporary and occur for a relatively short period. <br />Therefore, the City would not provide transportation for students around the construction zone. <br />Response PH3 -7 — Raul Yanez <br />See Response PH3 -1 related to construction vibration and historic properties. PH1 -2(1) related <br />to a general discussion of construction activities. <br />Response P113 -8 — Madeleine Spencer <br />See Response PH1 -1 related to community outreach and distribution of notices. <br />Response PH3 -9 — Unknown Speaker <br />Section 3.10 in Table 3.10 -6 on page 3 -127 of the EA /DEIR includes a detailed parking analysis <br />which includes a discussion of parking loss outside the Downtown area. The alignment outside <br />the Downtown area, west of Flower Street to Raitt Street would be the same for all of the build <br />alternatives. No parking loss would occur west of Raitt Street or to the east of the Downtown <br />area. As shown in the following table, 53 percent of street parking would be removed along <br />Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt and Flower Streets. <br />Existing Spaces <br />Scenario and Segment Spaces Lost Remaining <br />Streetcar Alternatives 1, 2 and IOS -1, and IOS -2 <br />Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt and Flower Streets 1 143 I 73 I 70 <br />Source: City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Traffic Impact Assessment Report, February 2012. <br />Santa Ana Garden Grave Fixed Guideway Project REAIFEIR P a g el 224 <br />January 2015 <br />75A -282 <br />