My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2015-02-03
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
02/03/2015
>
FULL PACKET_2015-02-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 2:35:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
2/3/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REVIEW OF SCHOOL RADIUS MAPS (Marijuana Dispensaries) <br />• Mr. Richardson indicated there are concerns with the first draft of the <br />initiative and that there is a need to regulate the uses. Schools need to be <br />a free zone from marijuana use. The SAUSD is interested in working <br />with the City to manage dispensary areas. <br />• Chief Rojas indicated there is a Federal code that requires a minimum of <br />600 foot radius for the placement of dispensary around schools. <br />Approximately 109 locations have been closed that did not meet this <br />requirement. <br />• Mr. O'Rourke indicated that the November 14th ballot has the language of <br />the initiative. The question is -will local measures supersede the Federal <br />requirement? City Council and SAUSD will need to work together to <br />support an ordinance and /or regulation of this issue. <br />• Mr. Reyna stated that he knows of the 600 ft. requirement, but would <br />support an increase of the radius to 1,000 ft. <br />• Mr. O'Rourke asked if this requirement includes private schools. If yes, <br />this would help provide additional support. <br />• Mr. Richardson indicated that there is a need to follow up by the end of <br />the month on the local regulation requirement. <br />REVIEW OF JOINT -USE AGREEMENTS <br />o Centennial Park Home Run Fence <br />• Mr. Dixon provided information on the fence issue and presented <br />the Godinez Fundamental High School proposal to keep the <br />homerun fence up year round. <br />• Mr. Tinajero indicated although the District committed to no fence <br />around the school, there is a need to fence the ballfields. He <br />stated that in order to be competitive the District must play year <br />round. <br />• Mr. Mouet indicated that the original agreement with the District <br />indicated no fencing. The agreement amendment allowed the <br />District to fence, but the fence to be removed after the season. <br />• Mr. Reyna asked if there were gaps in the fence for public access. <br />The response was yes; between the ballfields. <br />• Ms. Amezcua inquired if the reason for the fence to stay up is due <br />to safety. <br />• Mr. Mouet indicated the SAUSD /City staff will work on an <br />amendment to allow the District to keep the fence up year round. <br />o Centennial/Godinez Synthetic Turf <br />• Mr. Mouet indicated that the City collects a soccer surcharge to <br />build new synthetic turf fields. Currently, the account has a balance <br />of approximately $400,000. The PREY Committee suggested using <br />the funds to install synthetic turf on the Godinez football /soccer <br />field. <br />City /School Joint Policy Meeting Pa e 2 Jame 10, 2013 <br />13X -22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.