My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - RESO - WATER RATES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
02/17/2015
>
75A - PH - RESO - WATER RATES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2015 5:35:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2015 5:23:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
2/17/2015
Destruction Year
2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Clerk's Office <br />Santa Ana City Council <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />2915 FEtg 10 AI`I 9' 24 <br />CITY OF SANTA P,Nf /'t <br />CLERK OF i'U,-. :,, <br />Re: Proposed Sewer and Water fees <br />To: Honorable Council Members, Mayor: <br />As a homeowner and resident I am writing to oppose the sewer, <br />water fee increases, and the Capital Recovery and Lateral fees, that may <br />be imposed as an incident of property ownership. <br />First, Proposition 218 (Articles XIII C & D California Constitution) <br />requires local governments to mail a ballot whereby the owner may <br />indicate his /her support or opposition to the proposed assessed fees. The <br />city merely mailed a letter requesting property owners send a "written <br />protest" to the City Clerk if they oppose the fees. Property owners failing to <br />respond to the city's letter, would be counted as supporting the proposed <br />increased fees This procedure is illegal and not in compliance with <br />Proposition 218. In 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled provisions of <br />Prop 218 apply to local water and sewer charges. <br />The city's letter confuses residents with gibberish, and no specifics on <br />proposed improvements and duration of payments. No neighborhood <br />meetings were held to inform homeowners and residents on the proposed <br />projects and related costs. <br />As the city is not in compliance with Proposition 218, the City Council <br />must reiect the proposed water /sewer fee and Capital Recovery and <br />Lateral repair fee proposal. <br />Sincerely, <br />75A -68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.