My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PIKE, ARNIE
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
P
>
PIKE, ARNIE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2017 2:40:52 PM
Creation date
3/11/2015 10:38:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
PIKE, ARNIE
Contract #
A-2014-278
Agency
City Attorney's Office
Council Approval Date
11/18/2014
Expiration Date
12/31/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 27, 2014 Bowers Museum, SSA Project #14048 <br />SALLY SWANSON <br />A&GHITSCM INC, <br />A field evaluation was conducted on July 29, 2014 of the site conditions and the public areas of the <br />building. Weather conditions were sunny and the temperature at the time of the start of the inspection <br />was approximately 720 degrees Fahrenheit. <br />Physical measurements were taken at selected and strategic locations to observe compliance <br />conditions. Continuous measurements of all possible variances in all actual field conditions were not <br />performed and thus, it is possible that variances in the irregularity of a surface or material could occur <br />and reflect a non - compliant condition where an otherwise compliant condition was noted. An <br />example of such condition might include the width of a walkway or change in the slope of a floor <br />surface that might result in slight a convex (hump) or concave (bird -bath) condition where <br />measurements taken in all directions, locations and in a continuous manner could reflect that <br />dimensional requirements were non - compliant. <br />In addition to the above, although professional care was taken with obtaining all measurements, it is <br />noted that no inordinate measures were utilized to verify true line, distance, bearing, level or plumb <br />conditions. Measurements that are not stated in the codes as between a "minimum" and "maximum" <br />or that are within a specified range of dimensions are considered absolute. Such absolute dimensions <br />are subject to conventional industry tolerances as allowed by both the ADAAG and Title 24 <br />requirements but do not fall under the purview of this CASp review for determination. Rather, such <br />determinations for acceptable tolerances are to be made by the Building Official, the Division of the <br />State Architect, the Department of Justice or other Authority Having Jurisdiction. An example of such <br />might include the issue that there is no change in level permitted within a required clear or <br />maneuvering space. Strict adherence could never be achieved since there are changes in level <br />between any materials or within a single material whether a tape measure or high -power microscope <br />is used. <br />Professional -grade equipment and instruments were used to obtain reasonably accurate field <br />measurements. Use of digital levels, calipers, shape- measuring gages, stop - watches, door - pressure <br />gages, templates and other instruments necessary to the measurement of a specific item were used <br />where appropriate. It is noted that no readings of sound, lighting, or color shade, contrast or index <br />levels were taken as part of this evaluation. Such readings require the service of an appropriately <br />licensed engineer or contractor to assist with such determinations where required. Examples of such <br />include measurements for alarm systems, elevators, lighting levels for egress systems, contrast between <br />surface colors, and etcetera. Metal -blade measuring tapes and digital levels were used to record the <br />dimensions. Since the dimensions reviewed were not of significant length and the ambient <br />temperature was not of significance range, no adjustments to any dimensions were made for any <br />expansion or calibration of any measuring device(s) at the time of the inspection. Digital equipment <br />was calibrated in accordance with manufacturer recommended procedures at the time of the <br />inspection. <br />August 27, 2014 SSA Project #14048 Page 3 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.