My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PIKE, ARNIE
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
P
>
PIKE, ARNIE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2017 2:40:52 PM
Creation date
3/11/2015 10:38:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
PIKE, ARNIE
Contract #
A-2014-278
Agency
City Attorney's Office
Council Approval Date
11/18/2014
Expiration Date
12/31/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 27, 2014 Bowers Museum, SSA Project #14048 <br />4 <br />SALLY SWANSON <br />ARCHITECTS, WC- <br />ICC /ANSI A 117.1 -2003: <br />104.2 Dimensions. Dimensions that are not stated as "maximum" or "minimum" are absolute. All <br />dimensions are subject to conventional industry tolerances. <br />CCR, TITLE 24, PART 2: <br />11 B- 104.1.1 Construction and Manufacturing Tolerances. All dimensions are subject to conventional <br />building industry tolerances except where the requirement is stated as a range with specific minimum <br />and maximum end points. <br />In light of the immediately above definition provided in the California Building Code (CCR, Title 24, Part <br />2), the Division of the State Architect has issued an Interpretation of Regulations Document (DSA /AC) <br />IR 1 1 B -8 "Use of Predetermined Construction Tolerance Guidelines for Accessibility" (revised 1/1 /2011), <br />where a strong caveat is presented against use of pre- determined construction tolerances. In the IR, <br />the State Attorney General has stated: <br />"We are concerned that the local building offeials and the members of the general public, when they consult <br />Construction Tolerance Guidelines,...may assume that they have been adopted by a state agency and therefore, <br />have the force ofstate law, which they do not. Such reliance, in our view, may result in violations of the California <br />Building Code and, possibly, litigation against the local building officials and /or property owners. " <br />Added to IR 1 1 B -8 is the following quotation from a United States District Court: <br />""at is an acceptable `dimensional tolerance' will vary, depending in part to the purpose for the standard and <br />the technological capacity to closely adhere to the target dimensions." <br />Similar to dimensioning, the Building Official, the Division of the State Architect, the Department of <br />Justice (DO-1), or other Authority Having Jurisdiction are charged with the respective issues such as; <br />considerations and determinations relating to equivalent facilitation, readily achievable, <br />disproportionate cost, unreasonable hardship, structural impracticability, technically infeasible, and <br />the like. <br />The observations and findings contained herein are limited in scope. Approvals, permits, and <br />inspections may likely be required by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) for any correction required <br />to achieve compliance. This report does not intend to address the code compliant status of non - <br />accessibility items either implicitly or explicitly. Always check with the AHJ for local codes and <br />regulations that also may apply. Appropriate legal counsel should be retained concerning any <br />responsibilities, exposure to liability or other risks that the property owner could encounter. <br />August 27, 2014 SSA Project #14048 Page 5 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.