Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan I Revised Scope of Work <br />City of Santa Ana, CA <br />TASK 3. COMMUNITY SURVEY <br />Community input will be key to developing project prioritization criteria. Building on the criteria <br />developed in the Complete Streets Plan and discussed at the first TAC meeting, a web -based <br />survey will be launched to confirm the level of importance of suggested and new criteria. We will <br />provide draft questions for review by City staff and administer via Survey Monkey, with City staff <br />leading survey distribution using invitations to participate through City Police, Complete Streets, <br />and other existing city and Facebook channels. Our team's bilingual staff will translate the study <br />into Spanish. City staff will work with local radio and city television to publicize the survey and <br />make print copies available through the library and City Hall. We will work with the city to <br />identify partners to publicize the survey, such as the Santa Ana Active Streets Coalition and its <br />member organizations as well as the Orange County Bicycle Coalition.'rhe survey questions will: <br />• Confirm the community's general needs and concerns surrounding automobile, bicycling, <br />walking, and transit safety <br />• Solicit resident input on how to improve mobility and access to important destinations <br />throughout the city, with an opportunity to define the relative importance of engineering, <br />education, enforcement, and encouragement measures <br />• Gauge support for multimodal transportation priorities and for how the City might invest <br />limited funds using a series of tradeoff-type questions that will inform the relative <br />importance of prioritization criteria <br />We will analyze and summarize the results in a brief summary memorandum, which will conclude <br />key findings to inform the project prioritization criteria for Task 9. <br />Deliverables: Community survey <br />Technical memorandmn: Summary of community survey results <br />Assampij(? gmdI or exclusions to the scope of work <br />It will be important to develop the survey instrument early in the planning process to give <br />the community sufficient time to respond and inform Task 9 prioritization criteria. <br />We will conduct a detailed review of citywide collision data for the last five years for which data <br />are available. We will provide a citywide analysis examining collision patterns by location and <br />collision type overall, and with a focus on bicycle- or pedestrian- involved collisions, a risk analysis <br />to identify factors that contribute to risk for vulnerable roadway users that may allow for <br />addressing high risk locations before crashes occur, and a hotspot analysis to identify high crash <br />locations and corridors. <br />4.1 Citywide Analysis <br />The citywide collision analysis will investigate trends including who is involved in collisions (e.g., <br />age of involved parties), when collisions are happening (e.g., time of day or year), where crashes <br />are occurring (e.g., intersections vs. midblock or proximity to transit stops), as well as <br />contributing factors (e.g., movement preceding collision by traffic control type). Based on <br />available data, the review will include, but not be limited to, time of day, day of the week, night <br />time, age of parties, year by year trends, primary collision factors, type of collisions, severity of <br />injury, and fatalities. The analysis will also identify high crash locations and corridors, as well as <br />provide a comprehensive risk analysis to identify contributing factors as described below. Once <br />NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc 13 <br />20A -15 <br />