My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20A - AA - SAFE MOBILITY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
04/07/2015
>
20A - AA - SAFE MOBILITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2015 4:40:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 4:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
20A
Date
4/7/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan 1 Revised Scope of Work <br />City of Santa Ana, CA <br />To inform this task, we will develop a technical memorandum early in the project that proposes a <br />set of preliminary project prioritization criteria based on our experience conducting bicycle and <br />pedestrian plans in other cities as well as criteria used in other active transportation safety plans. <br />The draft criteria can be discussed with the TAC during the first meeting early in the planning <br />process. As discussed in Task 5, active transportation prioritization processes typically include <br />measures reflective of demand, network deficiency and feasibility. The criteria that will be used to <br />rank projects along street segments or intersections will be informed by the data collection, <br />community survey, field review, and collision analysis tasks. Criteria may include, but not be <br />limited to: demand factors (volumes of pedestrians and bicyclists, proximity to specific land - <br />uses), deficiency factors (traffic volumes, posted speed, number of lanes, number of <br />collisions /severity of injuries, collision patterns) as well as feasibility factors (ease of <br />implementation, cost). We can also add criteria that address health and equity, providing points <br />for example to projects in low income neighborhoods or areas of high transit dependency. <br />Deliverables: Technical memorandum of proposed evaluation criteria <br />Prioritized list of safety projects <br />Assumonons anai or excwsrons to me scope or worK <br />We suggest presenting preliminary draft prioritization criteria to TAC for feedback <br />during the first meeting early in the planning process. <br />TASK 10: FINAL PLAN REPORT <br />We will assemble the results from the above tasks into a highly graphic and easy -to- understand <br />final report that effectively conveys the study findings and decision - making framework that <br />results in the recommended projects and actions. In addition to the items identified in the RFP, <br />we will develop a concise executive summary to convey the process and key findings /outcomes <br />that can be shared with the public, elected officials, or other decision- makers. <br />Final report will include but not be limited to the following: i. Introduction, if. Relationship of this <br />document to existing documents, iii. Collision analysis, iv. Toolbox of potential street <br />improvements, v. Recommended improvements, vi. Cost estimates, vii. Prioritization, viii. Matrix <br />of proposed countermeasures, ix. Appendices (include all relevant data) <br />Deliverables: Draft and final Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan <br />Executive summary <br />Assumptions andl or erusions to the scone of toork <br />• We suggest developing a concise, graphical executive summary to convey process and <br />key outcomes that can be shared with the public, elected officials or other decision - <br />makers. <br />NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 110 <br />20A -22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.