My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2015-04-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
04/07/2015
>
FULL PACKET_2015-04-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2015 11:31:54 AM
Creation date
4/3/2015 10:59:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
4/7/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
850
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan i Revised Scope of Work <br />City of Santa Ana, CA <br />A <br />s <br />The Nelson \Nygaard team stays up -to -speed on all local, regional, and state guidelines, policies, <br />and regulations as this is important to our clients. Some potential solutions will involve multiple <br />agencies. For example, a roadway reclassification would involve not only the City of Santa Ana, <br />but may also impact the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) designation for a given <br />facility and would require. OCTA approval. The process to "downgrade" the designation of a <br />MPAH roadway would require additional analysis and submittal to OCTA to prove that the <br />reclassification would not impact the regional mobility goals maintained by OCTA. Additionally, <br />some types of funding provided to Orange County cities are calculated based on the number of <br />MPAH miles within a jurisdiction. The "downgrade" to non -MPAH status may impact future <br />funding to the City. Finally, should the recommendations impact freeway ramp intersections or <br />other Caltrans facilities, Caltrans approvals would likely be necessary as well. <br />Our team is aware of these processes and can help guide the City of Santa Ana on the associated <br />impacts. Early in the process, our team will perform a consistency review of relevant guidelines <br />and policies to identify potential obstacles or challenges to implement certain countermeasures. <br />We will review all proposed countermeasures for consistency with local, regional, and state <br />policies, regulations, and guidelines. We will highlight inconsistencies (we will not discard any <br />potential countermeasure based on this factor alone, but call it out for consideration in project <br />prioritization), and provide recommendations that could allow implementation. <br />Recommendations may include but are not limited to engineering surveys for speed limit <br />reductions, reclassification of streets, or obtaining approval for pilot /study projects. <br />Importantly; the Nelson \Nygaard team is providing guidance and leadership in many aspects of <br />CEQA reform, and is working closely with the California State Office of Planning and Research to <br />develop meaningful responses to the new policies and shifting priorities. As such, our team is well <br />positioned to provide support for environmental review of the plan, should a need be determined. <br />Deliverables: Technical memorandum reviewing consistency of proposed countermeasures with <br />local, region, and state policies, regulations, and guidelines. <br />A6sunru #ions an..d or avAusj„gtis to f e sco zeudlz aor <br />We suggest presenting preliminary findings of an initial consistency review as an early <br />confirmation during TAC meeting number 2 (see Task r.). <br />• <br />The Nelson \Nygaard team will prepare cost estimates for street improvement options at the street <br />segment or intersection level, The cost estimates will use local unit costs to provide a planning <br />level understanding of the cost implications of each improvement to allow for a cost constrained . <br />plan that the City to include cost as a measure of effectiveness. The cost information developed . <br />will be included in the prioritization system as an input to the ultimate ranking of the <br />countermeasures. <br />Deliverables: planning level cost estimates for projects identified in Task 6.1 <br />Preliminary engineering cost opinions fo{ the 5 project cut sheets <br />Assuum tions nq/ or exclusions to the scope of work <br />No special concerts. <br />NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc 19 <br />20A -21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.