Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana <br />• Aesthetics <br />• Agricultural and Forestry Resources <br />• Air Quality <br />• Biological Resources <br />• Cultural Resources <br />• Geology and Soils <br />• Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />• Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />• Hydrology and Water Quality <br />• Land Use and Planning <br />• Mineral Resources <br />• Noise <br />• Population and Housing <br />• Public Services <br />• Recreation <br />• 'Transportation /Traffic <br />• Utilities and Service Systems <br />chapter L IntrodvCtlon and 5UMMary <br />The Environmental Checklist Form prepared for this project is found in Appendix A of this <br />Addendum. It contains a series of questions about the project for each of the Impact categories. <br />There are six possible responses to each of the questions included on the Environmental Checklist <br />Form, as follows: <br />1. Substantial Change in Project Requiring Major IS /MND Revisions <br />2. Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major IS /MND Revisions <br />3. New Information Resulting in New Significant Impacts <br />4. New Information Resulting in More Severe impacts <br />5. New Information Identifying New Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Significant Impacts <br />6. Less Than Significant Impact/No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis <br />1.5 Summary of Findings <br />Based on the Environmental Checklist and supporting environmental analysis, the changes to the <br />proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously <br />addressed in The Met IS /MND. The scope of design modifications would not result in any new <br />impacts that are not alreadycovered in The Met IS /MND, and none of the conditions set forth in <br />Section ] 5162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would otherwise require preparation of a <br />subsequent Negative Declaration are met in this instance. <br />The MeC at South coast 3 March 2015 <br />Addendum <br />75A -68 <br />