Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana <br />Chapter 3. Environmental Impact Analysis <br />• Procedures and engineered designs related to site grading, densification of subsurface soils, <br />shallow and deep foundations, retaining walls, lateral loads, flexible pavements, and drainage. <br />• Foundations, soils preparations, and slabs design to resist the effects of the expansive soils. <br />• Where the project extends below the groundwater level, a mat foundation designed to resist <br />hydrostatic pressures will be used to support tine building. The mat foundation and exterior <br />walls will be water proofed and designed to resist hydrostatic uplift forces date to shallow <br />groundwater and settlement of soils due to groundwater or seismic related movement. <br />• Recommendations regarding appropriate foundation design, including type arid depth of <br />foundation footings, bearing pressure, and lateral loads. <br />3.2.4 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />The Met IS /MND found that the previous project would result in less- than- siginificantimpacts after <br />implementation of rriitigation related to the generation. of greenhouse gas [GHG) emissions. Less- <br />than-significant impacts were found to occur related to conflicts with all applicable plan, policy, or <br />regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. <br />As discussed in The Met IS /MND, construction of the previous projectwould generate GHG <br />emissions through the use of on -site heavy -duty construction equipment and off -site vehicle trips <br />generated byconstruction workers as well as haul /delivery trucks that travel to and from the <br />project site. Mobile source emissions would result from the use of construction equipment such as <br />graders, scrapers, bulldozers, wheeled loaders, and cranes. Operational emissions would be <br />generated by mobile, energy, waste, andwater consumption sources. The proposed projectwould <br />also generate construction and operational GHG emissions that are expected to be similar, if not <br />lower, as a result of shortening the construction phase from 22 months to 12 months and decreasing <br />the amount of excavation required from 144,895 cubic yards to 34,000 cubic, yards. Therefore, the <br />proposed project's contribution to GHG emissions would not exceed the amount previously analyzed <br />and disclosed in The Met IS /MND. Furthermore, the proposed projectwould be required to <br />implement all mitigation measures as proposed in The Met IS /MND, which are listed below. No <br />additional or new significant impacts that were not previously addressed in The Met IS /MND have <br />been identified, and the proposed projectwould not representa substantial change from the <br />previous conclusions in The Met IS /MND. <br />Mitigation Measure GHG -1; Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant will <br />prepare a recycling /solid waste reduction plan that includes equal provisions for both recyclinge <br />and solid waste facilities and provides recycliIIge and solid waste disposal services that are <br />consistent with Municipal Code Section 1.6 -37. This plan is subject to review and approval by the <br />City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency. The City will ensure that the proposed project includes a <br />recycling /solid waste reduction program that can achieve a minimum reduction of 50 percent by <br />volume. <br />Mitigation Measure GHG -2: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City of Santa Ana <br />Planning and Building Agency will ensure that the proposed project incorporates energy <br />conservation measures in Title 24's 2008 Building Energy Efficiency Standards into the design of the <br />The Meta[ South Coast <br />36 <br />Addendum <br />75A -84 <br />