Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix A <br />Environmental Checklist <br />1 AESTHETICS <br />Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a <br />scenic vista? <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic buildings within a <br />State scenic highway? <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of the site and its <br />surroundings? <br />d) Create a new source of substantial light or <br />glare which would adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views to the area? <br />2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES <br />In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the <br />California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model( t997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conseivatlon <br />as an optional model to use In assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether Imoacts to forest <br />resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the <br />California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's Inventory of forest land, Including the Forest and <br />Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement molhodology <br />provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, <br />or Farmland of Statewide importance <br />(Farmland), as shown on the maps <br />prepared pursuant to the Farmland <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program of the <br />California Resources Agency, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural <br />use, or a Williamson Act contract? <br />the Met at South Coast A-1 March 2015 <br />Addendum <br />75A -90 <br />CFj <br />C <br />CN `p <br />id da <br />C N_ <br />z <br />3 C <br />M <br />ISSUES: <br />NUn <br />z= <br />z5 <br />zzKN <br />jELL <br />1 AESTHETICS <br />Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a <br />scenic vista? <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic buildings within a <br />State scenic highway? <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of the site and its <br />surroundings? <br />d) Create a new source of substantial light or <br />glare which would adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views to the area? <br />2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES <br />In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the <br />California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model( t997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conseivatlon <br />as an optional model to use In assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether Imoacts to forest <br />resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the <br />California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's Inventory of forest land, Including the Forest and <br />Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement molhodology <br />provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, <br />or Farmland of Statewide importance <br />(Farmland), as shown on the maps <br />prepared pursuant to the Farmland <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program of the <br />California Resources Agency, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural <br />use, or a Williamson Act contract? <br />the Met at South Coast A-1 March 2015 <br />Addendum <br />75A -90 <br />