Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) <br />(c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the <br />project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality <br />standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone <br />precursors)? <br />The SCAB is designated by the EPA and the State as being nonattainment for 03 , PM10 , and PM2.5 . In <br />accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than <br />the daily threshold values does not add significantly to a cumulative impact. Since the proposed project would <br />not exceed the SCAQMD's significance thresholds for construction activities or the operations phase, the <br />SCAQMD does not consider emissions from the project to add significantly to any cumulative impact. <br />Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed project would increase the capacity at three out of the four <br />study intersections (Bristol Street at Edinger Avenue has already been widened) during both AM and PM <br />peak hours. Increases in roadway capacity would result in improvement in the LOS along Bristol Street. The <br />improvement in LOS would result in increases in average vehicle speed and reductions in the amount of delay <br />vehicles experience at intersections thereby resulting in both lower emissions and lower emissions rates <br />associated with higher vehicle speeds. As such, the project would continue to result in a beneficial impact. <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the <br />1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No additional new mitigation measures are required. <br />(d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? <br />A project could have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it <br />would cause or contribute substantially to elevated pollutant concentration levels or place the project in an <br />area with elevated pollutant concentrations. An evaluation of air pollutant emissions as it affects local <br />sensitive receptors has been conducted for both the construction and operations phases of the project. <br />Localized Construction Impacts <br />Localized air pollutant emissions are evaluated relative to the exposure of local sensitive uses to air pollutant <br />concentrations generated by the proposed Project. These are pollutant concentrations which can be directly <br />correlated to the health -based ambient air quality standards. This differs from regional emissions which were <br />discussed previously in that regional emissions are used to assess how much air pollution is generated within <br />an air basin and does not have a direct correlation with health effects. <br />Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) have been developed by the SCAQMD for NOx , CO, PM10, and <br />PM2.5 . The LSTs determine whether project- related emissions would substantially contribute to or exceed <br />the ambient air quality standards and expose sensitive receptors to excessive concentrations of air pollutants. <br />The LSTs differ based on distance such that a greater allowance in air pollutant emissions is allowed for <br />construction activities occurring further from a sensitive use and a lesser allowance in emissions is given for <br />construction activities occurring closer to sensitive uses. <br />Only short-teen emissions occurring at the project site for the Project's constriction phase were included to <br />determine if sensitive receptors local to the project site would adversely affected. Emissions generated by <br />construction activities disperse rapidly with distance from the construction site. Individual construction <br />phases were compared against the SCAQMD's LST significance criteria. As shown in Table 6, project <br />emissions would not exceed the LST screening level criteria for CO, NO2 , PM10 , or PM2.5 . Because <br />emissions associated with this alternative would be less than the LST, onsite construction emissions would <br />not be expected to exceed the federal or California AAQS at the nearest sensitive receptors. As such, no <br />significant air quality impacts related to localized air pollutants would occur from the construction phase. <br />ANA 305 -194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 29 <br />