My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 - AGMT FOR HSG FIN ANALYSIS AND ADIVSORY SERV
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Housing Authority (1999 - Present)
>
2015
>
04/07/2015
>
5 - AGMT FOR HSG FIN ANALYSIS AND ADIVSORY SERV
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2015 4:39:47 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 4:34:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Community Development
Item #
5
Date
4/7/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CSG Advisors Incorporated January 28, 2015 <br /> Proposal: Housing Financial Analytical and Advisory Services Page 7 of 25 <br /> not for developments with tic) programmatic market equivalent e.g,, special needs, etc.). This <br /> analysis establishes a ceiling that represents the maximum arriount required to subsidize affordability <br /> - preventing the City from subsidizing basic project feasibility (this counters the occasional efforts of <br /> developers to use public, agency funds to subsidize all otherwise infeasible project under the guise of <br /> SUbbiclizing affordability). The maxiintim subsidy thus is equivalent to the ceiling, less certain <br /> expected sources (e.g., low income housing tax credits). <br /> We do this work to help public agencies SLICII as the City determine how nILICh to assist a project. <br /> The expertise we bring is demonstrated by the even more extensive modeling we have to do for <br /> those public agencies (SLIch as housing authorities) who act as their own developer oil 4% and 9% <br /> tax credit projects. We assist in the formulation of (and perform analyses of) the development <br /> program including affordability, rent structure, proposed financial structure and relevant <br /> restrictions; develop and maintain the development pro fort-nas and casliflow analyses; develop the <br /> bond and financial structure; solicit, select and negotiate with lenders/credit enhancers; identify and <br /> coordinate application for financing sources (including JoNA7 jilConie housing tax credits, tax-exempt <br /> bonds, Multifamily Housing Program funds (ill California), AHP, etc.). We also solicit and <br /> negotiate with tax credit investors. Agencies for which we have provided these types of set-vices <br /> include the New York City Housing Authority, Flousing Authority of the County of Monterey, the <br /> I-IOLISing Authority of the City of Oakland, ttie San Francisco Housing Authority, and the HOLISilIg <br /> Authority of the City of New Orleans, among others. This type of work enables to us remain fully <br /> abreast of market conditions that have a practical impact on project feasibility as well as providing <br /> practical knowledge of developer goals and incentives, <br /> Example: Santa Monica Civic Center Housing, CSC; assisted the City of <br /> Santa Monica in developing a financing plan for the ("'ivic ("Cilter llousing <br /> dc"'Cloplile[It's. Understanding the finandal feasibility of' the proJects litdped <br /> Santa Monica structure the best possible deal with the third,party developer(s) <br /> thar will exectite the projects and to understand the likely amount of subsidy <br /> that will be required, the tradeoffs between affordability ind sulAdy levels, and <br /> the types of fillancing the developer is likely to need. I)cvclopers need this type <br /> of inl:'Orination before responding to an RFQ/RFP it, order to provide <br /> snbstantive proposals. <br /> In our work we met Nvith Agency staff" to revie-,A, the goals for the project and <br /> constraints. We explored issues stich as affordability t,,irvets, rent levels for <br /> market and aff')rdablc units, coinineivial space feasibility, construction cost <br /> limits ill the tax credit plwMng and timing issues, compethiveness for <br /> 9% credit awards, and differences between financings using 9(% tax credits and <br /> those using bonds and 4%) tax credits. This work resulted ill a collipl-01.10lisive <br /> financial planning r1lodel 14 the Civic Center housing developi lie n- s t- <br /> Using <br /> this model, we worked widi Agency staff to evalliarc financing Scenarios alld <br /> develop al Ibase case" the finallcillg. We then assisted ill the rfficW of <br /> proposals and negotiations with the selected developer. <br /> Responses to the Foreclosure Crisis. CSG lielped design the Neighborhood Stabilization <br /> Program initiatives for the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Orange County Housing <br /> Authority, the City of Phoenix and numerous other communities. Its the example of llhoenLx, we <br /> helped tirilize a significant portion of NSP funnels for the City to hell:) acqUire rind rehabilitate large <br /> troubled multi-family projects instired by Fl]A, We thus helped the City negotiate the discounted <br /> purchase of a 500-unit property with 50% vacancy, rasing NSP flinds for the rehabilitation work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.