My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2015-05-19
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
05/19/2015
>
FULL PACKET_2015-05-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2015 1:43:23 PM
Creation date
5/15/2015 1:30:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
5/19/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
492
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Pulido re- opened the Hearing for additional comments. <br />George Garcia asked about carbon emissions. <br />There were no additional speakers and the Mayor closed the Hearing. <br />Council discussion ensued. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, noted that recommendation is a simple <br />assignment instead of amended development agreement; proposed <br />amended recommendation keeps .8 acres as originally designed in 2012 <br />and requested clarification on inclusionary housing fee — will be returning <br />to City Council in the future with amendments to Housing Opportunity <br />Ordinance. <br />Interim Executive Director Fregoso, explained that recommendation <br />maintains $3,000 per unit fee which is consistent with 2012 provisions; <br />assigns terms of original agreement unless applicant is proposing <br />changes to project — consistent with other projects. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, satisfied with fee set at $3,000; stressed <br />importance to clarify formula in Housing Opportunity Ordinance. <br />Mayor Pulido, asked City Attorney if there were any entitlement issues as <br />approved by the City Council in 2012. <br />City Attorney Carvalho, recounted that approval in 2012 was in itself an <br />amendment to the original project; recommendation is an assignment <br />because developer decided not to move forward with additional changes; <br />2012 approval is vested and transferring over. <br />Mayor Pulido, look forward to high rise; thanked applicant. Will high rise <br />require new Environmental Impact Report? <br />Interim Executive Director Fregoso, indicated that if high rise tower <br />proposed it would require new Environmental Impact Report since existing <br />study only takes into account current number of units being built. <br />Councilmember Martinez asked developer to be mindful of water <br />conservation efforts. <br />Applicant noted that project will satisfy State of California requirements <br />and City of Santa Ana Storm water requirements. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 16 MAY 5, 2015 <br />1 0A -16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.