My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2015-05-19
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
05/19/2015
>
FULL PACKET_2015-05-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2015 1:43:23 PM
Creation date
5/15/2015 1:30:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
5/19/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
492
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
composed of City staff from relevant City departments. Each member of this panel will evaluate and rank each proposal <br />using the evaluation criteria listed below: <br />1. Demonstrated ability of the developer team to develop. Capacity to obtain such additional funding as may be <br />necessary, to obtain the necessary entitlements, to successfully manage and complete the construction process <br />as quickly as possible. (20 percent) <br />2. Demonstrated ability to manage affordable rental units so as to insure both ongoing compliance with <br />affordability requirements and long term financial solvency. (15 pert <br />3. Demonstrated readiness of the proposed project to <br />financing. Appropriate zoning. (30 percent) <br />4. Proposed levels of affordability. (15 percent) <br />5. Extent to which City funds will be leveraged by <br />6. Anticipated cash flows as shown by pro forma. (10 <br />Bonus Points: The City's desire is fo <br />Additionally, the City wishes to have a <br />have a project which incorporates two a <br />Once the panel has completed its review <br />interview with the panel. <br />XV. PUBLIC RECORDS <br />Pror <br />with <br />.'- Ps <br />: your reques <br />i M -37, Santa <br />XVI. FILING A <br />nds as shown by sou <br />site control and availability of <br />uses budget. (10 percent) <br />-e located in Oran ounty, California. <br />target areas identified in this RFP, and to <br />)r larger families. <br />the top rated proposers to an <br />nt. Interested offerors may submit a written request, <br />the evaluation. Proposer information identified as <br />he extent allowed under the California Public Records <br />Development Agency, Attn: Natalie Verlinich, 20 Civic <br />Proposers may file a t" wi City's Community Development Agency. In order for a proposer's protest to <br />be considered valid, the vy, s <br />1. Be filed in writing within fide (5) business days of either the RFQ/RFP posted date or before 5:00 p.m. of the 5th <br />business day following the posting of RFQ/RFP results /Notice of Intent to Award Contract on the City's website; <br />2. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation; <br />3. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested; <br />4. Specify, in detail, the grounds of the protest and the facts supporting the protest; and <br />5. Include all relevant, supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing. <br />If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, it will be rejected as invalid. If the protest is valid, <br />City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency <br />Request for Proposals for Affordable Housing Development <br />Page 9 <br />19E -14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.