Laserfiche WebLink
City of Los Angeles proposed a motion and Recommendation on the conservation turf program: <br />Authorize terms of staff option above but with the following modifications: <br />residential Incentive to be $2/SF up to 3000 SF. $1/ SF over 3000 SF <br />( I don't support the commercial incentive at this time) <br />Commercial incentive to be $2/SF up to 6000 SF. $ 1 SF. Over 6000 SF. With 2 acre max, <br />$93,120 annual incentive cap <br />Public Agency: $ 2 SF up to 6000 SF. $1/SF over 6000 SF. 5.7 acre max, $250,000 annual <br />incentive cap( I think the annual incentive cap should be higher for the public agency and the <br />acre max) <br />Brief Background on my committee vote last Monday: <br />I supported the Los Angeles recommendation above in a committee meeting last Monday. The <br />commercial incentive was the only issue I had with this action. In my personal opinion, I <br />think we should provide more funding incentives for residential and public agencies at this time. <br />We can amend the program next year to include commercial. <br />The City of Santa Ana highest water use comes from Santa Ana Residents at 67 percent. The <br />Commercial sector uses 19 percent of water. City Government only uses 3 percent of <br />water. With that being said, public agencies like Santa Ana will need to leverage these turf <br />removal dollars to comply with the Governor Executive order in removing turf from all city <br />medians. City staff has an estimate of $ 14.5 million dollars to remove all turf on medians and <br />replace it with friendly drought landscape. <br />In closing, I would like to get your input at tomorrows council meeting as we discuss the cities <br />proposal for a water conservation plan. MWD has a special meeting next Tuesday to vote on this <br />conservation program funding and turf removal program. <br />Michele Martinez <br />