My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25G - AGMT - INMATE HOUSING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
06/16/2015
>
25G - AGMT - INMATE HOUSING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 4:40:28 PM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:14:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
25G
Date
6/16/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EROIGSA -15 -0007 <br />(c) Any reduction in the IGSA price under paragraph (b) of this clause due to defective data from <br />a prospective subcontractor that was not subsequently awarded the subcontract shall be limited to <br />the amount, plus applicable overhead and profit marlcup, by which (1) the actual subcontract or <br />(2) the actual cost to the Service Provider, if there was no subcontract, was less than the <br />Prospective subcontract cost estimate submitted by the Service Provider; provided, that the actual <br />subcontract price was not itself affected by defective certified cost or pricing data, <br />(d) <br />(1) If the Contracting Officer dctermines under paragraph (b) of this clause that a price or <br />cost reduction should be made, the Service Provider agrees not to raise the following matters <br />as a defense: <br />(i) The Service Provider or subcontractor was a solo source supplier or otherwise was in a <br />superior bargaining position and thus the price of the IGSA would not have been modified <br />even if accurate, complete, and current certified cost or pricing data had been submitted. <br />(ii) The Contracting Officer should'have known that the certified cost or pricing data iaz <br />issue were defective even though the Service Provider or subcontractor tools no affirmative <br />action to bring the charactar of the data to the attention of the Contracting Officer. <br />(iii) The IGSA was based on an agreement about the total cost of the IGSA and there was <br />no agreement about the cost of each item procured under the IGSA. <br />(iv) The Service Provider or subcontractor did not submit a Certificate of Current Cost or <br />Pricing Data. <br />(2) <br />(i) Except as prohibited by subdivision (d)(2)(ii) of this clause, an offset in an amount <br />determined appropriate by the Contracting Officer based upon the facts shall be allowed <br />against the amount of a IGSA price reduction if - <br />(A) The Service Provider certifies to the Contracting Officer that, to the best of the <br />Service Provider's knowledge and belief, the Service Provider is entitled to the offset in <br />the amount requested; and <br />(B) The Service Provider proves that the certified cost or pricing data were available <br />before the "as of date specified on its Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data, and <br />that the data were not submitted before such date. <br />(ii) An offset shall not be allowed if- <br />(A) The understated data were known by the Service Provider to be understated before <br />the "as of" date specified on its Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data; or <br />33 <br />25G -36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.