NELSON NYGAARD - 2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan I Revised Scope of Work City of Santa Ana, CA To inform this task, we will develop a technical memorandum early in the project that proposes a set of preliminary project prioritization criteria based on our experience conducting bicycle and pedestrian plans in other cities as well as criteria used in other active transportation safety plans. The draft criteria can be discussed with the TAC during the first meeting early in the planning process. As discussed in Task 5, active transportation prioritization processes typically include measures reflective of demand, network deficiency and feasibility. The criteria that will be used to rank projects along street segments or intersections will be informed by the data collection, community survey, field review, and collision analysis tasks. Criteria may include, but not be limited to: demand factors (volumes of pedestrians and bicyclists, proximity to specific land - uses), deficiency factors (traffic volumes, posted speed, number of lanes, number of collisions/severity of injuries, collision patterns) as well as feasibility factors (ease of implementation, cost). We can also add criteria that address health and equity, providing points for example to projects in low income neighborhoods or areas of high transit dependency. Deliverables: Technical memorandum of proposed evaluation criteria Prioritized list of safety projects Assumptions and/ or exclusions to the scope of work • We suggest presenting preliminary draft prioritization criteria to TAC for feedback during the first meeting early in the planning process. We will assemble the results from the above tasks into a highly graphic and easy -to -understand final report that effectively conveys the study findings and decision -malting framework that results in the recommended projects and actions. In addition to the items identified in the RFP, we will develop a concise executive summary to convey the process and key findings/outcomes that can be shared with the public, elected officials, or other decision -makers. Final report will include but not be limited to the following: i. Introduction, ii. Relationship of this document to existing documents, iii. Collision analysis, iv. Toolbox of potential street improvements, v. Recommended improvements, vi. Cost estimates, vii. Prioritization, viii. Matrix of proposed countermeasures, ix. Appendices (include all relevant data) Deliverables: Draft and final Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan Executive summary Assumptions and/ or exclusions to the scope of work • We suggest developing a concise, graphical executive summary to convey process and key outcomes that can be shared with the public, elected officials or other decision - makers. NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 110