My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25G - AGMT - WASTE DISCHARGE SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
10/06/2015
>
25G - AGMT - WASTE DISCHARGE SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 4:43:07 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 4:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25G
Date
10/6/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. FEE PROPOSAL: <br />Proposer's fee proposal shall be submitted concurrently with the technical proposal, but in a <br />separately sealed envelope, clearly labeled as "Fee Proposal." This shall include the firm's <br />Standard Hourly Fee Schedule, and/or a Project Fee Schedule where applicable and as <br />outlined in the Scope of Work. <br />Where fees are NOT included as part of evaluation criteria, the fee proposal will not be <br />opened until the proposals have been evaluated by the proposal selection committee. The <br />City will select the consultant based on qualifications, and then negotiate a contract price <br />based on available funding. <br />Where fees ARE included as part of the evaluation criteria, the fee proposal will be opened <br />and reviewed concurrently with the proposal, and weighted per the percentage identified in <br />'T GENERAL ". <br />4. CERTIFICATIONS: <br />The following forms, included in Attachment 3 in the Appendix of this RFP shall be signed <br />and included as part of the proposal submittal package: <br />• Attachment 3 -1: Non - Collusion Affidavit <br />• Attachment 3 -2: Non - Lobbying Certification <br />• Attachment 3 -3: Non - Discrimination Certification <br />V. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) <br />A. EVALUATION AND RATING <br />Refer to Section I, General. <br />B. SELECTION <br />The committee may interview the top ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of the <br />agreement to the proposer who will provide the best quality and value to the City. City reserves <br />the right to begin negotiations and enter into an agreement without interview or further <br />discussions. <br />VI. AWARD OF AGREEMENT <br />A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee, the Executive Director will <br />recommend award of an agreement to the proposer providing the best quality and value to the <br />City. <br />B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT <br />A standard agreement is included as Attachment 2, in the Appendix of this RFP. "Proposer" will <br />hereinafter be referred to as "Consultant" in standard agreement. The teen of the agreement will <br />City of <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.