My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2015-10-20
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
10/20/2015
>
FULL PACKET_2015-10-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2015 4:02:41 PM
Creation date
10/16/2015 8:20:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
10/20/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
568
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
volume of current traffic that has increased through the years, and safety in general. <br />He recommended not simply focusing on property owner rights, but also extend <br />sensitivity to the many neighborhood tenants. <br />Madeleine Spencer noted that residents did not really believe that the project would <br />actually occur; expressed resident and property owner apprehension due to issues <br />concerning fair market values; and ensuring there is dialogue with the community so <br />that residents and property owners can be part of the process. <br />5. PRESENTATION: DROUGHT WATER RATE SURCHARGE <br />Water Resources Manager Nabil Saba provided a summary of the city's drought <br />water rate surcharge and he reviewed available options. Option 1 would be a <br />surcharge of approximately $2,40, for an average residential water bill of <br />approximately $58.20; and, the addition of $1.88 to recover the penalty if the <br />reduction is not met; he also estimates loss of revenue in the amount of $4.4 million. <br />Option 2 is recommended by staff and would add a surcharge of $7.37 to customers <br />exceeding the allocation, with an average residential bill of approximately $63.17 per <br />month; and the addition of $1.88 to water use to recover the penalty. Option 3 would <br />recover revenue loss through adding a fixed surcharge of $11.16 on all water users <br />which would increase the monthly bill to an average of approximately $66.96 per <br />month; and the addition of $1.88 to recover the penalty. <br />Councilmember Martinez stated a preference for Option 2, and residents that exceed <br />allowed usage would need to pay accordingly. Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento stated <br />that it appears that Option 2 would probably be preferred as the most viable option, <br />without the addition of costs for the recovery penalty at this time. Mr. Mousavipour <br />advised that penalties for violations of the Executive Order are uncertain, so the <br />option to assess the surcharge of $1.88 to residents is not being taken at this time; <br />he also added that exemptions are available to some businesses and residents with <br />special disabilities and circumstances; and added that Santa Ana is one of the first <br />cities to study and implement the Executive Order. Councilmember Martinez <br />emphasized that the City is also a water customer and should also be providing <br />records to demonstrate water reductions. <br />FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS <br />• Streetcar Project Update <br />• Sewer Lines Ownership Ordinance Amendment <br />r s t rr <br />C ..) <br />For06 Ortiz <br />Recording Secretary <br />Public Works Agency <br />Development & Transportation Council Committee Minute 3A-1 7 June 25, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.