Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan Enforcement, Education and Outreach Expanded Scope <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Trask 2.6 Enforcement Recommendation; <br />Based on the work in Task 2, above (New Task 4.5), we will develop specific enforcement <br />recommendations related to 1) process /system improvements; 2) directed patrols; and <br />3) diversion programs, The recommendations will assume three levels of investment for <br />each improvement category, and estimate the needed additional staffing resources, <br />budget and relative collision reduction outcomes. <br />We will review the recommendations, and confirm estimated costs with a focus group of <br />enforcement personnel and revise in accordance with their concerns. <br />Deliverables: <br />• Summary of opportunities and constraints to changing current practices related to <br />enforcement, data collection and data storage. <br />• Enforcement recommendations related to 1) process /system improvements; 2) directed <br />patrols; and 3) diversion programs <br />This scope of work will develop a recommendation for a school curriculum that can be <br />taught by school or city personnel. This curriculum will build on the current efforts and <br />support the development of confident cyclists, better future adult drivers, and a culture <br />of tolerance for alternative transportation. <br />The Stakeholder interviews in Task 1.4 will identify which curricula the traffic safety <br />program should comply with. If they use the SPARK physical education curriculum, <br />which is flexible to add bike safety education material, we will work to comply with that. <br />The curriculum must be approachable to a wide variety of teachers so that it will be <br />taught regardless of staffing changes. <br />An optional scope of work could be undertaken to develop Santa Ana specific Lesson <br />Plan materials for incorporation in an existing prototypical traffic safety program. We <br />recommend that the materials be developed the fall of 2015, with test teaching taking <br />place late in 2015 -16, and that the materials can be revised for adoption by the district in <br />the 16 -17 school year. We have budgeted time as optional tasks for the development, <br />and revision, assuming our work would otherwise be dark on this project between <br />February and June. <br />Optional Task 3.1 Curriculum Review <br />Subsequent to developing a shared understanding with the stakeholders of the target <br />audiences, the potential instructors, and the important messages, we will review sample <br />programs for their flexibility in meeting those goals and recommend a program best <br />suited to Santa Ana. We will also review sample education programs for their ability to <br />meet California Physical Education Standards and for their performance against criteria <br />NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 15 <br />20A -8 <br />