My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-02 Regular
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
2016-02-02 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:42:44 PM
Creation date
2/18/2016 2:22:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
2/2/2016
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INDUSTRIAL (M-1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 88 (SD-88) (AA <br />NO. 2014-04) AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 88 (SD- <br />88) FOR SAID PROPERTY <br />B. ORDINANCE NO. NS-2893 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT <br />AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2001 EAST DYER <br />ROAD, BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND HERITAGE <br />VILLAGE OC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION <br />MOTION: Amezcua SECOND: Tinajero <br />VOTE: AYES: Amezcua, Benavides, Pulido, Reyna, Sarmiento, <br />Tinajero (6) <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSTAIN: None (0) <br />ABSENT: Martinez (1) <br />Council discussion ensued on last item for consideration. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, noted that last item on the recommendations was to <br />amend the development agreement to include the in -lieu fees, as recommended <br />by Planning Commission, <br />City Attorney Carvalho, indicated that if it was Council desire to draft the <br />language and negotiate with the developer, she can do that. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento motioned to approve, seconded by Councilmember <br />Benavides. <br />Councilmember Reyna, asked for clarification that affordable units will be built <br />as part of another development. <br />Planning and Building Executive Director Haghani, confirmed and noted that <br />Planning Commission had made the recommendation, although the Planning <br />Commission has not considered the project that funds would be earmarked; the <br />housing opportunities ordinance provides for the developer to express <br />preference to earmark in -lieu fees for certain project, but not obligatory. Also, if <br />Council approves option #7 on the agenda report those provisions are not <br />included in the drafted documents but additional action will be required. <br />Councilmember Reyna, clarified that option #7 would allow staff to negotiate <br />with developer, but matter would be agendized for Council consideration in the <br />future. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 23 FEBRUARY 2, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.